Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary schools rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
Acquiring a foreign language has become a trendy matter nowadays. Numerous education professionals have claimed that the best place to start learning a new language is at primary schools not later. This essay aims to explore the advantages and disadvantages of such a debatable issue in further detail and before coming to a conclusion.
To begin with, there is no doubt that pupils in early ages have the ability to learn many skills and languages faster than others in later period. Firstly, a plethora of studies have shown that children between 4 and 9 years old have a higher ability to learn up to 3 different languages more than older peers. Since, there is an inverse relationship between the age of the brain and the ability to obtain more skills. To put simply, the more brain age the less capabilities to acquire new languages and skills. Secondly, children at the first three years has no complex subjects and few topics to study. Therefore, they have more time to focus in learning a new language.
On the flip side, teaching different languages in early ages might create some few problems for children. First of all, pupils at early ages might get confused when learning a new language rather than the original language that their families communicate. This in fact impacts on students’ life, as, it produces a conspicuous gap between them and their families. In consequently, they might prefer the new language more than their native one and start communicate only through it. For example, in my country Syria, lots of new schools offer an english curriculum only. This unfortunately might contribute in replacing the original language into another new language.
To sum up, Although studying a new language might initiate some confusions for students at early ages, I wholeheartedly believe that the positive impacts outweigh the disadvantages.
- In many countries, Student absent is a worrying problem for both parents and educators. What are the causes of this issue, and what may be the effects on the child and the wider community? 73
- A successful person is one who earns a lot of money. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The younger generation is mainly responsible for the latest technological developments. How far do you agree? 89
- You have received a bill from a mobile phone company for international call charges relating to a time when you did not use your phone for international call. Write a letter to companyComplaining about thisGiving your reasonsAsking for bill to be changed 56
- Some people believe that homework should not be given to students. But other people believe that homework should be given to students. Explain both the views and also give your opinion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 338, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tail and before coming to a conclusion. To begin with, there is no doubt that pu...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 458, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun capabilities is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
.... To put simply, the more brain age the less capabilities to acquire new languages a...
^^^^
Line 7, column 674, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...me to focus in learning a new language. On the flip side, teaching different lan...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ive impacts outweigh the disadvantages.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in fact, no doubt, first of all, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15960912052 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80322258292 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560260586319 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3187252224 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1875 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283444044398 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864023917532 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505120353946 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173590927922 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427750527878 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.