The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.
Given is a map of an island comparing it before and after some tourist facilities were constructed.
As shown in the figure, before the construction of tourist facilities, there had been only two areas of coconut trees in the west and the east of the island. The island remained intact.
With regard to the structure of the island after tourist facilities were built, the island showed a enormous change. In the north of the island is a restaurant, linked to the pie in the sea by a vehicle track. There is also a reception surrounded in the path on the way from restaurant to the pier. Surrounding the coconut tree in the north of the island is a zone of accommodation. Beyond this, meanwhile, to the east of the reception, is an even larger residential zone with many accommodation.
It is also interesting to note that while the beach had no use at all before the construction of tourist facilities, it is then taken advantage of for swimming. The footpath surrounding the residential zone to the north of the reception terminates at the beach. There is also a footpath linked all the accommodations in the east of the island.
- Please provide information which you feel will be of interest to the selection panels of the program.THE STORY OF MY LEADERSHIP 80
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricutural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make 80
- The diagram below shows career paths in the travel industry Write a report 80
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace. Others think that the true function of an university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake, regardless of whether the cour 70
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five cities between 1990 to 2002 compared with 1989. 95
flaws:
Not so well organized.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 11 10
No. of Words: 199 200
No. of Characters: 909 1000
No. of Different Words: 93 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.756 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.568 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.845 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 58 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 38 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 31 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 26 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.091 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.515 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.364 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.457 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.64 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.144 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4