The diagram below shows the life cycle of plastic bottles. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagram illustrates the process of making plastic bottles, and what happens to them afterward during their life cycle. Overall, the plastic goes through harvesting cereal and processing plant before it’s formed to a bottle and ready to be used, then continues its cycle in the rubbish to either get recycled or to the landfill.
In the first stage of making plastic bottles, after harvesting the cereal, the cereal gets transferred to the processing plant, then shifts to several steps to turn the cereal into the known bottle form, starting with extracting the glucose, then ferment the finer product into polymers, finally shaped into bottles and ready to be transferred and sold.
Continuing with the plastic bottles' life cycle, where its the longest, compared to the making and forming stage, the bottle gets trashed after it has been used, it either gets recycled to use again or stays in the landfill where it’s almost impossible to biodegrade plastic.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 29, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'bottles'' or 'bottle's'?
Suggestion: bottles'; bottle's
...sold. Continuing with the plastic bottles life cycle, where its the longest, comp...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 55, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...h the plastic bottles life cycle, where its the longest, compared to the making and...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 828.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24050632911 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45162294313 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563291139241 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 22.4926829268 173% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.0452085658 43.030603864 198% => OK
Chars per sentence: 207.0 112.824112599 183% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.5 22.9334400587 172% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149307452128 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107864518637 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603678676615 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112502948271 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445223765342 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.0 13.2329268293 174% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.35 61.2550243902 66% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 10.3012195122 168% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.9970731707 160% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.