TPO22-Integrated writing
The reading asserts that Ethanol fuel cannot be a suitable replacement for gasoline because of several reasons. The lecturer, however, finds the idea dubious and casts doubts on the reasons mentioned by the reading passage.
The reading argues that using ethanol fuel cannot solve global warming problems. When ethanol fuel is burned, they produce CO2 like gasoline fuels. Conversely, lecturer brings up the idea that since ethanol fuel will be generated from plants, they do not lead to global warming. The professor mentioned that for supply the plants for producing ethanol, we have to grow these plants. As a consequence, plants absorb CO2 from the atmosphere and cause to reducing the amount of co2 in the air.
Furthermore, reading holds the view that for producing ethanol, we have use lots of plants to address this need. This way can cause decrease of available plants for animals. On the contrary, professor underlines the fact that ethanol prepares from cellulose, while animals do not eat this part of plants. As a result, using this particular part of plants do not lead to reducing available plants for animals as a source of food.
Finally, the reading mentioned that ethanol fuel cannot compete with gasoline on price because government support ethanol-producing by allocating some taxes to this industry now. So, if government does not support producing ethanol, its price will go up. The professor dismisses this idea and mentions that the government should support this industry continuously. Therefore, when production of ethanol would increase by this financial support, its price will decrease as well.
- Do you agree with the following statement? The government should support scientific research even if there’s no practical use. 73
- TPO48 78
- Do you agree with the following statement The government should support scientific research even if there s no practical use 66
- TPO28 75
- TPO22-Integrated writing 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ons mentioned by the reading passage. The reading argues that using ethanol fuel ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 260.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28461538462 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67122514719 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507692307692 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 415.8 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.25165562914 479% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.4015649021 49.2860985944 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.6 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86666666667 7.06452816374 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.442326112735 0.272083759551 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168016011171 0.0996497079465 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0894519966313 0.0662205650399 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269535474218 0.162205337803 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583736942471 0.0443174109184 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.