The bar graph gives information about the spending of time of youngsters in hours per week in Chester from 2002 to 2007.
Overall it can be seen that huge time was being spent on watching television while very less on bowling.
To go to pubs or discos teenagers used to spend approximate 10hr per week from 2002 to 2006 and then it has increased substantially to 17hr per week in the subsequent year. Watching television started at 25hr per week in 2002 and increased to 37hr in 5 years. Time spending on Shopping started from over 5hr and increased to 15hrs per week and it was constant for the last 2 year, that is, in 2006 and 2007.
Efficiency to seat for homework has decreased from over 10hr per week to 6hr in 6 years. Youngsters used to play sports for 10hr in a week in 2002 but it decreased to almost 2hr in 2007. The trend of watching DVDs has got increased till 2004 and decreased thereafter. Fluctuation has been observed in spending of time on Bowling.
- The graph below shows the population figures of different types of turtles in India between 1980 and 2012.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 56
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying fulltime or part-time.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where rele 67
- Some people believe that to be successful at sport you need a natural ability and others think that hard work and practice can make you successful. Discuss both views and give your opinion ? 56
- The bar chart shows the hours per week that teenagers spend doing certain activities in Chester from 2002 to 2007 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 800.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49438202247 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54315114082 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511235955056 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 207.9 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.9020244039 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8888888889 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.77777777778 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335348942944 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146666107522 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128507563652 0.0843802449381 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216416699151 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.159854774316 0.0819641961636 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 86.03 61.2550243902 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.97 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.