. Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position
The author of prompt asserts that most of explorations and inventions are done haphazardly without the plan, while the scholar was seeking response for another question. This is a claim with which I generally do not concur with. Among the countless reasons and facts which give adherence to my viewpoint, I would list the most conspicuous ones in what follows.
First of all, I prefer to shed a spotlight on the creation and invention of novel things. A striking reason which rejects the validity of this belief, the creation process is so precious and detailed, that there is no way for accidental achievement. In other words, the invention progress possesses various phases all of which requires full concentration and well-organized plan. In this case, is it possible that an invention or a creation occur haphazardly without a previously planned program? An instance which can shed a spotlight on this fact is the invention of the airplane. Its invention had gone through different attempts by people from varied spots in the universe, and finally, the Wrights Brothers by considerations of others' failure and required demands had designed a plane which fitted with the ultimate desire of human beings. This example explicitly depicts that during the invention process is a complicated one which cannot be handled without precise consideration and planning.
Secondly, the discoveries, in which the explorer finds the existed fact in the world, is also cannot be occurred randomly. A crucial reason which should be considered at this point is that any discovery requires knowledge and information about the topic. According to this reason, if a person with shallow comprehension faces a novel option, the feasibility of ignorance is high, since he does not have an idea about the scientific value of that option; consequently, easy underestimate its existence. This fact is also verified by a notable intelligible psychology study in my country. According to this refreshingly study, the importance of the surrounding events increases by approximate fifty-five percent as an individual has a chasm understanding of the issue. Therefore, as A person who has no idea about the accidentally encountered issue, the possibility of overlooking that issue is high, and it would not lead to the scientific discoveries.
However, what are aforesaid should not be overgeneralized is entire cases. If the case is relevant and the scientist is knowledgeable about the finding, there are some cases in which the discoveries have occurred by chance. Especially in the field of chemistry, some the elements in the periodic table had been discovered in by chance. While the chemist was looking for another element, he had figured out the other one. This event happens as the explorer is the chemist who has comprehension over the topic; besides, there was a prediction about the undiscovered elements, which illustrate there were a plan and detailed list guiding the chemist. So, meanwhile, the discoveries are done by chance; there is a concrete background for its occurrence.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned reasons and facts obviously show that most of discoveries and creation cannot happen unexpectedly for the following reasons. Firstly, the creation needs a well-established and detailed plan; secondly, there should be knowledge over the founded option, otherwise, it would be ignored.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-25 | batterylow_123 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | Omar Ibna Nazim | 16 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | okazaki11 | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | jayauen | 83 | view |
| 2023-02-10 | Yam Kumar Oli | 58 | view |
- Topic: Some university professors let their students choose their research topic themselves. Some do not. Which one do you think is better. Why?@ 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better to finish a project completely and then begin another project than to work on two or more projects at the same time. 73
- tpo1.1 86
- tpo36-integ writing 3
- Claim: The surest indicator of a great nation must be the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists.Reason: Great achievements by a nation's rulers, artists, or scientists will ensure a good life for the majority of that nation's people 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the explorations') or simply say ''most explorations''.
Suggestion: most of the explorations; most explorations
The author of prompt asserts that most of explorations and inventions are done haphazardly wit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 77, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the discoveries') or simply say ''most discoveries''.
Suggestion: most of the discoveries; most discoveries
...d reasons and facts obviously show that most of discoveries and creation cannot happen unexpectedly...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion, otherwise, it would be ignored.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, finally, first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2864.0 2235.4752809 128% => OK
No of words: 539.0 442.535393258 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31354359926 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81833721656 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09368186962 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 277.0 215.323595506 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513914656772 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 889.2 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 13.0 4.99550561798 260% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2505814694 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.333333333 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4583333333 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.21951772744 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142034066614 0.243740707755 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0435243606365 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0314255862535 0.0758088955206 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0862823967138 0.150359130593 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419178243283 0.0667264976115 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 159.0 100.480337079 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.