Some people think that school should use teaching methods that encourage students to cooperate. Other people think that schools should use teaching methods that encourage students to compete.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There is a continuous debate about the purpose of school that they should teach students whether to boost cooperation or raise the competitive morale. Actually, for the sake of children, both sides bring different vital advantages that will be undeniably useful in the future. This will shed some light and expand my partial supports on the given ideas.
First and foremost, it is indispensable to create a friendly and full of inspiration environment at school by educating students to be a social person. Obviously, outreaching the theoretical lessons from classes, pupils can enhance their teamwork skills and spirits through a multitude of team building activities or field trips. Another upside of this teaching method is that score will no longer be burden to students. Therefore, they could learn with the most amiable atmosphere or find it comfortable to share experiences and talk their voices since they are friends, not counterparts with jealousy. By this way, school are ideal places for children to grow and become more respect when accepting the differences among people.
On the other hand, students also should be trained to get accustomed to the stiffness of future work as they could gain maturity and confidence. Hence, there is an important mission of instructors to open the avenue for their children to compete or in the other way of saying, to know when and how to grab opportunities for themselves. Furthermore, through rigorous battles, pupils will perceive their actual abilities in order to evaluate more exactly and reflect the progress they made, which could motivate them to study harder for better performance. If everything at school is too easy to handle, they will lack of carefulness, dexterity or even feel daunted.
In conclusion, both the given methods play complementary roles in educating students to live and work in any social situations. Thus, focusing more on one of them could make children find it difficult to master the necessary skills.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-24 | nhaxquyeen | 95 | view |
- The table below gives information on consumer expenditure on different items in five different countries in 2002.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevent. 78
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive and negative development? 89
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective? 89
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace. Others think that the true function of a universities should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake, regardless of whether the cou 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1680.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23364485981 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80901891093 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623052959502 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0889226962 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9285714286 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15610933404 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536223723103 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525461784994 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0979539951796 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381708811083 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.