The line graph shows the arrivals of visitors from different parts of the world .
The line graph illustrates the number of people visited in five different regions of the world such as North America, Central, and Eastern Europe, South-East Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa, and America.
At the onset, it is clear that the greater number of tourists arrived in North America than South America, while the arrival of tourists from Central and Eastern Europe soared with the passes of time.
Now, turning into the details, in 1990, the number of North American commuters was 70 million, which steadily climbed to over 90 million in 2000 before felling slightly 89 million. In the case of South American and Sub-Saharan African traveled exactly 7 million in 1990, but the number of people who were from Sub-Sharan Africa escalated to 20 million whereas the visitors from South America plunged at just over 10 million in 2005.
Regarding South-East Asia, only 20 million people were visitors whose number gradually increased to 35 million in 2000 before reaching almost 50 million in 2005. In contrast, there were only 30 million people who visited from Central and Eastern Europe in 1990, although the number of visitors surged into 60 million in 1995. Then the toll of commuters increased slightly to 70 million in 2000, which further goes upward to 90 million in 2005.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-25 | Dipa Hayat | 67 | view |
- The line graph shows the arrivals of visitors from different parts of the world . 67
- The graph shows the wheat export in different countries in million of tonnes. 67
- The pie chart shows the expenditure for Candian households in 1992 and 2002. 67
- The bar chart below gives information about the percentage of the population living in urban areas in the whole world and in different parts of the world. 67
- The graph shows the number of trips which was done by children in one country in 1990 and in 2010 travel to and from by using various types of transports. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...llion. In the case of South American and Sub-Saharan African traveled exactly 7 m...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, so, then, whereas, while, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1072.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03286384977 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38341414945 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507042253521 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.3847333598 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.142857143 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4285714286 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 5.23603664747 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125416109646 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648353434479 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539545173016 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0919477188069 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442744122104 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.2329268293 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.49 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.