Some people think that giving their children a certain amount of money every week will help them have fewer financial problems in the future. Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays there is a contentious argument over whether children who are paid weekly, have less financial difficulties in the future. I totally agree with this matter because they know how to manage their financial issues and also, they learn how much it is important to have plan for their budget and some saving money as well.
First of all, it is noteworthy to say that childhood is the best period that children can learn some critical skills. Managing the financial issue is one of those skills which plays a vital role in their future. When children are give a certain amount of money for a specific duration of time, for example a week, they will learn how to control their costs. To illustrate, they are forced to avoid spending their money without thinking, which help them to become more thoughtful in upcoming years.
Another reason to be agree is that this method of payment results in being more independent which bring a new set of positive concerns. When children have their own money, they become aware about the importance of saving money. Besides, they will learn how to afford their costs without the support of their parents. The main positive consequence of this situation is that when they become adults, they are able to solve their problems by themselves. Also, they are able to make investment in different projects and make a huge amount of profit.
On the other hand, they will learn how to overcome the limitations. In fact, they will learn to be creative-thinker and try to think out of the box. They have to find some alternative solutions to increase their money such as finding a part-time job which leads to more experiences and skills.
In conclusion, I tend to believe that those children who are paid weekly money are more successful in managing their financial issues in adultness. Because they know how to control their costs based on their budget and also, they become awareness about the necessity of saving money. Given this situation, it seems these children will become smart-shopper and become familiar with economic knowledge which can help them to make money or increase their capabilities in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-28 | yaldaasgari | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-28 | yaldaasgari | 73 | view |
- The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities today is by reducing the need for people to travel from home to work shopping and education To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think this is a positive or negative social development? 67
- In developing countries children in rural communities have less access to education Some people believe that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers while others think that the problem can be solved by providing computers and Inte 84
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language.Do you think this is a positive or negative social development? 11
- The chart below shows the percentage of total US population aged 65 and over between 1900 and 2000. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 275, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'planned'.
Suggestion: planned
... learn how much it is important to have plan for their budget and some saving money ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, if, so, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 48.0 24.0651302605 199% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1807.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95068493151 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53385409771 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47397260274 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 5.43587174349 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4504381357 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.294117647 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4705882353 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64705882353 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286873227134 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101996490346 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052789682571 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183500816288 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511406380707 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.