The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders; if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked, both its economy and national identity are endangered. Because illegal immigrants pose such threats, every effor

Essay topics:

The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders; if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked, both its economy and national identity are endangered. Because illegal immigrants pose such threats, every effort must be made to return them to their country of origin.

The argument made in a newspaper editorial says that the autonomy of any country was is based on the strength of its borders. The author argues this based on the information that the illegal immigrants pose such threats, every effort must be made to return them to their country of origin. The author's argument from the information in the newspaper editorial can not be examined without some proofs and evidences. Some more informations should be needed to examine this argument effectively.

To begin, how the illegal immigrants cannot be checked when they enter the country? No country will allow the immigrants to enter their country without checking them. If there is a possibility of illegal immigrants entering a country without get checked by the country, how it happens, is there any examples or proofs that it is a posssible thing that can happen. Without any analysis or proofs we cannot say that the thing like illegal immigrants are entering a country without got checked. This is accusation. So proofs and analysis that how this is possible will help to examine this argument effectively.

Further, How the illegal immigrants alone weaken the autonomy of any country or how the illegal immigrants playes a main role in this aspect? Other aspects like governance, their own people, industries, education and development of the country also plays a vital role in autonomy of any country. How strength of a country's border will alone play an important role in autonomy of any country rather than other important and development aspects of the country. Immigrants will sure expect to return to their own country or origin, but how does it turns into threats that will affect the autonomy of the country.

Thus the argument, as it stands now, is flawed with some unstated assumptions like immigrants could be left without checking. If the author is confident and is sure that he is right, then he must provide answers and proofs asked above, to make the argument effective. The more informations needed will help to examine the argument effectively

Votes
Average: 5 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-21 nikki1610 63 view
2019-11-27 Mat Pro 69 view
2019-11-12 bishal sitaula 59 view
2019-11-09 Roshan Dhakal 59 view
2019-10-06 man_si_jain 72 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 291, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...return them to their country of origin. The authors argument from the information i...
^^^
Line 1, column 295, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...rn them to their country of origin. The authors argument from the information in the ne...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 546, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'turn'?
Suggestion: turn
... own country or origin, but how does it turns into threats that will affect the auton...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 546, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'turn'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: turn
... own country or origin, but how does it turns into threats that will affect the auton...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...fect the autonomy of the country. Thus the argument, as it stands now, is flaw...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, thus

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.6327345309 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.9520958084 108% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 11.1786427146 98% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 28.8173652695 101% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 55.5748502994 76% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 16.3942115768 85% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1730.0 2260.96107784 77% => OK
No of words: 342.0 441.139720559 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05847953216 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.56307096286 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67432469702 2.78398813304 96% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 204.123752495 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.438596491228 0.468620217663 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 544.5 705.55239521 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9540859598 57.8364921388 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.764705882 119.503703932 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1176470588 23.324526521 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.70588235294 5.70786347227 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.88822355289 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352958009811 0.218282227539 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128668124845 0.0743258471296 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110384254985 0.0701772020484 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201616461712 0.128457276422 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.097456786479 0.0628817314937 155% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.3799401198 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.3550499002 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.5979740519 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.32208582834 90% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 98.500998004 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 12.3882235529 73% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 342 350
No. of Characters: 1685 1500
No. of Different Words: 148 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.3 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.927 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.594 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 131 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 102 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 60 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 35 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.118 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.737 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.353 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.379 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.578 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.215 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5