The author asserts that a popular musician's genuine talent can be truly appraised only after his death and after the passage of few generations. He claims that fame and popularity would interpose in the honest assessment of the musicians' both natural and achieved endowments. It is true that many gifted personalities have not been recognized for their eminent contributions to society and have been rewarded posthumously, however, the 'all-or-nothing stance that this recommendation takes regarding the assessment of musicians' talents is difficult to agree with.
In the first place, in today's unprecedentedly competitive world a musician builds his or her career with great endeavors. Unless a musician possesses true skills he or she will not come to the limelight only. For instance contemporary singers like Rihanna, Jennifer Lopez, Lady Gaga, Michael Jackson, Shreya Ghosal, Sunidhi Chauhan, Arijit Singh did not become popular in a day, month, or even a year. Instead, they had to face tough challenges at every step of their career and took years to prove their mettle in their lifetime.
In the second place, it is unwise to confuse an actor's fame and stardom that might depend on their admirable phenotype and a hint of luck, with that of a musician's struggles with their vocal chords. A musician can never become famous, unless his or her music appeals to our ears and stays in our hearts while they are still alive. For example, Lata Mangeshkar and Asha Bhonsle, have reached the summit of success in their lifetime and already possesses lifetime achievement awards.
Moreover, if the author's claim is true, then the musician would not witness the fruits of their efforts. This would be extremely unfair to these creative beings and they donot deserve this.
Therefore, it would be right to contend that talented musicians must be recognized and accoladed for their grit, determination, and hardworks in their lifetime. The author's claim of assessment after demise is unjust to the artists.
- Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach. 50
- Laws should not be rigid or fixed. Instead, they should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times and places 50
- The function of science is to reassure; the purpose of art is to upset. Therein lies the value of each. 50
- The function of science is to reassure the purpose of art is to upset Therein lies the value of each 79
- "Important truths begin as outrageous, or at least uncomfortable, attacks upon the accepted wisdom of the time." 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'musician'?
Suggestion: musician
The author asserts that a popular musicians genuine talent can be truly appraised o...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 49, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'actors'' or 'actor's'?
Suggestion: actors'; actor's
...econd place, it is unwise to confuse an actors fame and stardom that might depend on t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, regarding, second, so, still, then, therefore, while, for example, for instance, it is true, in the first place, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 324.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22839506173 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76050183307 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9793989426 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9285714286 5.21951772744 229% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269040645326 0.243740707755 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0915711205745 0.0831039109588 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591805989579 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150636038526 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0753778589705 0.0667264976115 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.