The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants.
"Butter has now been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. Only about 2 percent of customers have complained, indicating that 98 people out of 100 are happy with the change. Furthermore, many servers have reported that a number of customers who ask for butter do not complain when they are given margarine instead. Clearly, either these customers cannot distinguish butter from margarine or they use the term 'butter' to refer to either butter or margarine. Thus, to avoid the expense of purchasing butter and to increase profitability, the Happy Pancake House should extend this cost-saving change to its restaurants in the southeast and northeast as well."
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
<span style="font-size: 19.36px;">The author claims that the employment of the students from Omega University has been tampered by the suspicious increase in grade levels due to the existing evaluation procedure of the faculties by the students and the employment has decreased when compared with nearby Alpha University. To second this the author has provided with three claims without proper evidence which are weakening the strength of the argument rather than substantiating it.<br/>To begin with, the author claims that, the introduction of the evaluation procedure has resulted in assigning higher grades to the students by the professors. The author has failed to cite the context in which the increase in grades is directly proportional to the appeasement of the student towards their professors. The professor could have graded their students purely based on their merit rather than the necessity to provide higher grades to please the student fraternity. In addition, the author has also cited that the average of the grades has increased by 30%. This again evokes required evidence based on which the claim is made. A higher bright student ratio, for example, could have been a significant factor for the increase in grade in addition to the changes in the system of education and the information technology for the last 15 years could have also attributed to the increase. Thus without proper facts that substantiate the above pieces of evidence, the claim doesn’t hold water.<br/>Secondly, the author claims that the employers didn’t heed to the dramatic increase in the grades and thus the Omega graduates have failed to secure a job. Again, the author has failed to provide the necessary evidence to hold the hypothesis true. Maybe there existed a case where the student’s major background or the specialization did not meet with the requirements of the employer. In addition, The Omega University due to this name could have highly focused more on the academic front that weakened the graduates' other potential weigh points for employment and thus making the employers consider these significant factors that didn’t make the Omega graduates, a healthy choice.<br/>Finally, the author also claimed that the nearby Alpha University graduates were more successful in terms of securing a Job comparing to the Omega graduates. This claim could be fundamentally questioned on the grounds on which the recruitment happened. Maybe the Alpha university had ties with the Organisation which conducted campus drives for placements. Or perhaps, the employers were the Alumni of the Alpha University and that could have had an effective influence on the recruitment.<br/>Thus the author though had a variety of claims that made the students of Omega University a poor choice to the employers, the author failed to prove the same with the stated evidence above. Thus the argument fails to acumen the facts with claims and it is specious at worst.<br/> </span><br>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | wo00_hi | 55 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | Yann | 43 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | bmartinurcelay | 63 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | asif13 | 59 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | Vignesh Harikrishnan | 16 | view |
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants."Butter has now been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. Only about 2 percent of customers have c 16
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants."Butter has now been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. Only about 2 percent of customers have c 16
- Fifteen years ago Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors Since that time Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes and overall student 67
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1396, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...d have also attributed to the increase. Thus without proper facts that substantiate ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 2905, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...he same with the stated evidence above. Thus the argument fails to acumen the facts ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.6327345309 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 13.6137724551 125% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 28.8173652695 69% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 55.5748502994 117% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 16.3942115768 146% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2538.0 2260.96107784 112% => OK
No of words: 470.0 441.139720559 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4 5.12650576532 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65612321451 4.56307096286 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2930616938 2.78398813304 118% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 204.123752495 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.446808510638 0.468620217663 95% => OK
syllable_count: 774.0 705.55239521 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.76447105788 160% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.8473053892 136% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 117.275099185 57.8364921388 203% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 169.2 119.503703932 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.3333333333 23.324526521 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.70786347227 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 5.15768463074 19% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0238660219174 0.218282227539 11% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00849707644709 0.0743258471296 11% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0126832026907 0.0701772020484 18% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0238660219174 0.128457276422 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0628817314937 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 14.3799401198 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 48.3550499002 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.197005988 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.5979740519 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.32208582834 109% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 98.500998004 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 12.3882235529 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.1389221557 129% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.