Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The statement suggests to relax the restrictions placed on research and development field which I would like to disagree with as I consider it to be same as any other field and should be placed with the same restrictions and rules as others. Each field have their own significance and no field is less compared to others.
Rules and restrictions are placed for certain reasons such that no individual misuses his powers and have an upper hand over others. History is the best example we could use for to stress upon this fact. During the second-world war times the race to build a biological weapon between the Russians and the Germans intensified and what did the race lead to? Unrestricted access to scientist and what did that in turn lead to? Inhuman torture and medical experimentation on war prisoners. The horror stories of those who survived after being a lab rat are chilling to hear even now. The effects of those inhuman and dangerous tests run by uncontrolled, rage driven scientists not only had it’s toll on the victims but also on the nurses, technicians and also on the very own scientists in some cases. When we consider our own history relaxing the restrictions on science and research field have only caused more destruction rather than development.
This case not only applies to one field but to all fields. Consider sports for example, the famous steroid abuse scandal of the 1980s in the American football field. Those were the times when the athletes were merely tested for any kind of drug use and were allowed to compete without any significant restrictions. A survey held later in the 2000s revealed a shocking fact that 95% of the athletes who used drugs during their football career had either passed away due to brain related diseases or were suffering from them. One may argue that these diseases might have occurred due to other reasons too but medical studies suggests the opposite. The use of performance enhancement drugs in major quantities are the major causes for these diseases.
Thus considering the past behavior of humans, whenever there were less restrictions laid upon us we didn’t do much productive things rather than harm our fellow beings. Hence I consider science and research field also not to be an exception and shall be o followed with the same kind of restrictions and rules to ensure we don’t repeat the mistakes of our past.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | pratysinha | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 75 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | asdfjmn | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | muthukrishna | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | Persian Moonlight | 16 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 15, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggests relaxing'.
Suggestion: suggests relaxing
The statement suggests to relax the restrictions placed on research and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... no field is less compared to others. Rules and restrictions are placed for ce...
^^^^
Line 13, column 67, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun restrictions is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...behavior of humans, whenever there were less restrictions laid upon us we didn'...
^^^^
Line 13, column 175, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ngs rather than harm our fellow beings. Hence I consider science and research field a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, second, so, thus, for example, kind of, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2004.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 407.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92383292383 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6615382009 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547911547912 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3614054535 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.333333333 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6111111111 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0992180950446 0.243740707755 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0278652308271 0.0831039109588 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431497099234 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0658873810774 0.150359130593 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404687806987 0.0667264976115 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.