As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Technology advancements has always raised contraversial challenges. One of these challenges is whether relying on new technologies to solve our problems has weakened our problem solving skills. I hypothyize that the ability of human to think has enhanced by relying more on new technologies because of three reasons.
First, making technologies that are reliable and have poblem-solving ability has forced human to think more, discover rules ,and provide new solutions. Many graduate studens and research teams have been working on technologies to be smart enough to solve problems at least as good as human. As an instance, autonomous vehivles have been an active research topics, which enables vehicles to drive with out any command of drivers. This problem itself has made many start-up companies and new areas of research in academic scope.
Second, as technolgies is advancing and people are relying more and more on machines to solve their problems, more challenging problems raise that persuade us to move forward. As an instance, ten years ago we were not able rely on a cell phones to give us the shortest path to a destination, Google search engine was not as good as it is now. All these rely on artificial intelligence which has been developed to solve our problems without any supervision. Although we have obtained some achievements so far, new challenging problems in artificial intelligence, for example, such as reinforcement learning are facing us to new and more challenging tasks.
Third, although above reasons were concerning with scientist and not ordinary people, ordinary people have also forced to learn and think more and more by relying on technology. New technologies has provide us to better comminicate with people of world.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-22 | pranav_kanth | 50 | view |
2020-01-17 | sefeliz | 58 | view |
2020-01-12 | shuocurity | 66 | view |
2020-01-05 | Mridul | 66 | view |
2019-12-31 | chrissyready | 66 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 50
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rced human to think more, discover rules ,and provide new solutions. Many graduate...
^^
Line 3, column 397, Rule ID: WITH_OUT[1]
Message: This word is usually written together. Did you mean 'without'?
Suggestion: without
...topics, which enables vehicles to drive with out any command of drivers. This problem it...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 31, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... tasks. Third, although above reasons were concerning with scientist and not ordinary people,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 200, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'provided'.
Suggestion: provided
...ing on technology. New technologies has provide us to better comminicate with people of...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, third, as for, at least, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 12.4196629213 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 2235.4752809 66% => OK
No of words: 281.0 442.535393258 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28113879004 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95459405298 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 215.323595506 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562277580071 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0704734242 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.153846154 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.69230769231 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247622927433 0.243740707755 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0948108439526 0.0831039109588 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06871224259 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163406767284 0.150359130593 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296048635905 0.0667264976115 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.