Some people think that showing sporting events on the television such as Olympics and World Cup tournaments can be the best way to encourage adults to do exercise. Others believe there are other effective ways to do so.
Discuss both views and state your opinion.
Nowadays, adults all over the globe are giving less importance to active lifestyle due to their sedentary living habits, and are suffering from various life threatening diseases. Some experts opine that telecasting of various international sporting events on television could overcome this problem; however, others and me believe that there are myriad of other ways which are more effective, and could encourage individuals to exercise on regular basis.
Proponents of broadcasting popular sporting events such as, Olympics and World cup tournaments, argue that while watching these types of programs, people are encouraged to remain fit. This is because, sports fans follow their favourite athletes rigorously, and try to replicate the same healthy lifestyle in their daily routines. For instance, World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE) has encouraged millions of youngsters worldwide to join gymnasiums and build their physiques like their favourite wrestling stars. Nevertheless, those die-hard fans are able to follow this fitness regime for a very short period as when they become adults, they are unable to continue this hobby due to their tedious work schedules and become careless about their health.
In order to find a permanent solution to this phenomenon, policymakers should come forward and help people in plethora of ways. Firstly, government should develop modern recreational centers in every locality of a city, and these activity centers should be subsidized. This way, people from low-income group would be encouraged to join the fitness regime without putting an extra burden on their pockets, and follow fitness regime seriously and permanently. Secondly, lawmakers should proactively advertise the drawbacks of not having exercise regularly through TV and radio advertisements. Citizens listen to their elected leaders very seriously, and follow their advise whole heatedly. All these practical measures could result in encouraging people to inculcate exercise in their daily schedule for their lifetime.
In conclusion, although telecasting major sports activities regularly on television could entice people to live actively, but this measure is short lived. I believe that, governments should provide abundance of subsidized leisure activity centers to its citizens, and sensitise them about the benefits of doing regular exercise to make their adult population healthy and fit for the lifetime.
- ou have recently employed a plumber to do a job at a place you were renovating however something went wrong with the work and it created a problem for your project Write a letter to the plumber and say What the problem is How it can be fixed Suggest how t 73
- Some believe that history has little to teach us about today while others think that the study of the past helps us to understand the present Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Today more and more people choose to live by themselves What are the causes of this Is this a positive or negative development 84
- Your local hospital has advertised for people to do unpaid work helping at the hospital You would like to do some work at the hospital in your free time Explain why you would like to do unpaid work at the hospital Say what type of unpaid work you would be 81
- Some people believe that entertainers are more important than scientists. Do you agree or disagree? Support with reasons and examples from your own experience. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2073.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77437325905 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80553529882 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610027855153 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 649.8 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 0.809619238477 988% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.4690096656 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.071428571 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6428571429 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151508769744 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0523575555083 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598526568364 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0996235496062 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391148412861 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.