All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
It cannot be denied that consultants are hired by companies to suggest ways for the company to be more efficient in their operations. I have to partially agree to the sentiment of the provided statements.
It's obvious that hiring conlustants outside of the company can have a very strong benefecial impact on the workings of the company itself. Consultants, which are more experienced on handling many different and varied companies, are much better than those with fewer experiences. Such consultants and consultancies provide mor rigorous decision making capabilities. This can be seen from various consultants around the worldthat are doing good. They use data intensive processes to help make the company more efficient in terms of its growth and operations. However, it cannot be said untrue that a company has to share its many internal data to the consultancy itself, as a result of which there might be leakages of some forms for the data.
While consultants are data-driven, it can also be done internally by the company itself if it is able to recognize each and every employees, their satisfactions and dissatisfactions. The company can create concrete plans by actually assessing each employees status. Thus rendering the progress of the company in forward direction. For a small startup, this can be done through regular meetings, stand-ups, monthly assessment, project revision, work revision, so on and so forth. However, there is a weakness in this method. As the company grows larger, there definitely comes a point where listening to each employees becomes a bottleneck for the process. In fact, for such scenarios, the company is divided into departments, each with own leader who can listen to the employees. However, in whatsoever manner there are certain processes which cannot just be done by only listening to the employees themselves. It has to be done on higher, abstract lelve.
In scenarios where the company needs faster decision-making action, and it is not quite sure if it has confidence enough to do so, it's better to have outside consultants to ponder on the subject matter for a while. A deicision taken on impulse and without much thought is sure to doom the company's progress in the long run. That is why, consultants use their experiences to try to come up with best possible series of actions that can be benefecial.
So, solely dependend on consultants isn't the best. The company should adopt a process that make use of internal employee assessment as well as consultants.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | Arpit Sahni | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | shamitha | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | JENIRSHAH | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | caseya5 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Siddiqur Rahman | 50 | view |
- Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station’s coverage of weat 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 16
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 192, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... which are more experienced on handling many different and varied companies, are much better t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 249, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...ncrete plans by actually assessing each employees status. Thus rendering the progress of ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 390, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the best'.
Suggestion: with the best
...use their experiences to try to come up with best possible series of actions that can be ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 37, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
... So, solely dependend on consultants isnt the best. The company should adopt a pr...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, however, if, so, thus, well, while, as to, in fact, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2127.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 412.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16262135922 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95913805365 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526699029126 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 653.4 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.9924006439 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6818181818 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7272727273 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.13636363636 5.21951772744 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.388229389277 0.243740707755 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113961279971 0.0831039109588 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0992706716233 0.0758088955206 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239512568891 0.150359130593 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0965074678801 0.0667264976115 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.