The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car, bus
or train between 1970 and 2030.
The line graph illustrates the amount of daily travelers in the United Kingdom by diverse types of transport. it depicts the current numbers and predictions during the period of 60 years.
Overall, the number of UK commuters using cars and trains outnumbered those, who are travelling by buses by gentil margin. While car and trains modes were relatively similar between the trajectories, there was some variance,the amount of travelers by buses declined steadily over the period.
At the beginning of the period number of commuters by trains have risen slightly and then remained plateau from approximately 2,7 millions in 1970 to 3 millions in 2010. After 2010 the number of population that used this type of transport will be saw a greatly increase by 2 millions. For those, who are using everyday cars, the trajectory was more consistent rising sharply over the period by nearly 5 millions.
The number of population travelling everyday life by buses has no significant changes, it remained unchanged for the first 10 years; meanwhile the remaining amount slightly declined over the next years by 1 million.
- Youth unemployment is increasing in many countries in the world What do you think are the main causes of this problem and what measures can be taken to solve it 79
- some people believe that software programming should be tacht at primary school others think that the focus at this level should be on playing both views opinion 91
- geothermal energy 78
- nowadays technology is influencing modern art in areas such as design painting and film 73
- How tomatos ketchup made. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... Kingdom by diverse types of transport. it depicts the current numbers and predict...
^^
Line 5, column 224, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...he trajectories, there was some variance,the amount of travelers by buses declined s...
^^^^
Line 9, column 171, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...millions in 1970 to 3 millions in 2010. After 2010 the number of population that used...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 252, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('greatly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...used this type of transport will be saw a greatly increase by 2 millions. For those, who are using...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 946.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22651933702 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79114359824 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624309392265 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7797054305 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.25 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205339657762 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0905834131497 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740681430337 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120534937172 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0736185459805 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.