The pie charts below show the spending of a school in the UK from 1981 to 2001.
The pie charts compare the percentage of spending annually on five categories in one of the schools in the UK in three different periods, 1981,1991, and 2001.
Overall, teachers' salaries comprised the biggest allocation of schools budget in the years given, while the smallest expenditure could be seen on insurance.
In 1981, the school allocated the highest allocation of budget on teachers salaries at 40%, after which the spending rose to a half in 1991 and dropped slightly to 45% in 2001. The expenditure on furniture and equipment decreased from 1981 to 1991 by 10% to 5%, then climbed to less than a quarter in the final year. With regard to money spent on resources, the figure went down significantly from 15% to 9 % between 1981 and 2001.
The school spent a mere percentage of money for insurance in from 1981to 1991but the spending grew to 8% in 2001. In 1981, 28% of the schools' budget was used for other workers salaries and decreased to just a fifth in 1991 and 2001.
- The table below gives information about consumers spending on different items in 5 different countries in 2002. 61
- The bar below shows the estimated percentage of car trips taken by drivers in 2005. 56
- The chart below shows the average weight of spoiled produce each week in British supermarkets since 1990 with predictions until 2030. 73
- The pie graphs below show the result of a survey of children's activities. 11
- Global warming is becoming a huge threat to human existence on this planet What are the causes of this What are the effects 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'years'' or 'year's'?
Suggestion: years'; year's
...est allocation of schools budget in the years given, while the smallest expenditure c...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 87, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cation of budget on teachers salaries at 40%, after which the spending rose to a ...
^^
Line 9, column 128, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 40%, after which the spending rose to a half in 1991 and dropped slightly to 45%...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.48453608247 27% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.03092783505 33% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 32.9175257732 0% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 26.3917525773 155% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.85567010309 130% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 826.0 937.175257732 88% => OK
No of words: 172.0 206.0 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8023255814 4.54256449028 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.78020617076 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63394871942 2.54303337028 104% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 127.690721649 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552325581395 0.622605031667 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 222.3 290.88556701 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.41237113402 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 12.6804123711 55% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 16.3608247423 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 23.6392962359 44.8134815571 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 118.0 76.5299724578 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 16.8248392259 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 4.34317383033 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 2.54639175258 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 7.41237113402 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.94845360825 177% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366553962981 0.216113520407 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167220826576 0.0766984524023 218% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0994459799882 0.0603063233224 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2212899905 0.12726935374 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119608103721 0.0580467560999 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 8.37731958763 161% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 70.7449484536 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 7.45979381443 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 8.71597938144 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 7.59969072165 99% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 41.2886597938 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 8.62886597938 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 8.54432989691 136% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 8.15463917526 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.