It is inevitable that as technology develops so traditional culture must be
lost. Technology and tradition are incompatible – you cannot have both
together. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? And give your own reasons.
Some people believe that advanced technology and traditional culture cannot exist simultaneously. I am in a consummate discord with this viewpoint. From my perspective, in the hi-tech life, tradition does not disappear, it just transforms to be in line with people’s awareness and technology supports human to preserve our ancestors’ heritage.
To embark upon, imagine that our culture was invariant regardless of science and technology achievements. Humans have no cities because our ancient custom requires us to live in a village or even a cave. However, we did not let this terrible theory occur. In fact, people always adjust themselves to be appropriate to the level of development. Therefore, our traditional culture also has to change and we should maintain only the core values.
The question is how to maintain the core values. I personally suppose that technology is an useful tool. Besides teaching some boring lessons about history and tradition, we can propagandize people with the mass media, which is surely an achievement of technology. Moreover, technology also assists us to protect old architecture buildings against time destruction. In my country, they use technology to preserve Ho Chi Minh body. He is a great person and a mental monument of Vietnamese culture in the new age.
In conclusion, technology not only is compatible with traditional culture but also is an useful measure to conserve heritage. From my viewpoint, it is not fair to blame technology for disappearance of some custom
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-10-09 | Nguyen Huu Trung | 100 | view |
- Computers are being used more and more in education.Discuss the advantages and disadvantages and give your own opinion. 78
- It is inevitable that as technology develops so traditional culture must belost. Technology and tradition are incompatible – you cannot have bothtogether. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? And give your own reasons. 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 107, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...re cannot exist simultaneously. I am in a consummate discord with this viewpoint. From my pe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 55, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., imagine that our culture was invariant regardless of science and technology ac...
^^
Line 3, column 70, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...our culture was invariant regardless of science and technology achievements. Hum...
^^
Line 3, column 274, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s terrible theory occur. In fact, people always adjust themselves to be appropria...
^^
Line 3, column 401, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r traditional culture also has to change and we should maintain only the core val...
^^
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...I personally suppose that technology is an useful tool. Besides teaching some bori...
^^
Line 5, column 477, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a great person and a mental monument of Vietnamese culture in the new age. In ...
^^
Line 7, column 87, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...le with traditional culture but also is an useful measure to conserve heritage. Fr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, as to, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1296.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 241.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.377593361 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19623299738 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614107883817 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6447548123 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.0 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0625 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4375 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202801049299 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660620834101 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532516212814 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133885564225 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422845829737 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.33 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.