Leader is the one who leads the group or society to betterment. The quality that classifies someone as good leader, is to lead the institution on path of progress along with ensuring the progress of an individual member of its institution. The leader is the one who pushes his/hers peers to theirs limits to for the their growth hence leading to growth of an institution. I do not agree with author that maintaining good relationship with his/her peers is more important than compromising with the moral values.
History has seen many leader, who has put moral values aside with taking decisions, and led worlds to chaos. One good example of this can be Hitler. Although, he was deeply revered by his followers, ignorance of moral judgment in was the reason for world war second.
Having sound moral judgment and maintaining respect of peers are completely different thing for any leader. It might be possible while having good judgment quality, a leader may have utmost respect from his peers and and vice versa. Comparing sound moral judgment quality with respect of his/hers peers towards him/her is like comparing oranges with apple.
To sum up, it is important to have characteristic of sound moral judgment in a leader. Respect of his/her follower is relative which can vary from people to people. If a leader is on right path, the follower eventually start to respect him/her for the decision he/she made considering moral values in mind.
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society’s problems.Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree. Be certain to fully develop your position and carefully consider ways in which your 50
- Do you agree or disagree that young people enjoy life more than older people do ?? 66
- Critics say that current voting systems used in the United States are inefficient and often lead to the inaccurate counting of votes. Miscounts can be especially damaging if an election is closely contested. Those critics would like the traditional system 80
- TPO-3: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made reading passage.Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings att 78
- A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting, lethargy, and other signs of illness. After the recall, the pet food company tested samples from the recalled foo 37
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 313, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
... his/hers peers to theirs limits to for the their growth hence leading to growth of an in...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 18, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun leader seems to be countable; consider using: 'many leaders'.
Suggestion: many leaders
...h the moral values. History has seen many leader, who has put moral values aside with ta...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
... may have utmost respect from his peers and and vice versa. Comparing sound moral judgm...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, may, second, so, while, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1212.0 2235.4752809 54% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 243.0 442.535393258 55% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98765432099 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.55969084622 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62001953474 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 215.323595506 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 364.5 704.065955056 52% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.8733973991 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.2307692308 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6923076923 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.38461538462 5.21951772744 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389519128514 0.243740707755 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141074247623 0.0831039109588 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0873088648845 0.0758088955206 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232031806765 0.150359130593 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0707176112525 0.0667264976115 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 100.480337079 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.