Based on the given materials, the article as well as the lecture discusses salt level increases in Salton Sea, which encounters high evaporation rate without enough replacement from other water sources. The author states that there are several viable mechanisms regarding resisting against the noticeable increases which are dangerous to living organisms there. That being said, the lecturer provides several ideas to repudiate this claim.
Initially, the writer says that this problem can be solved by an extraction process in which salt is separated from water and the pure water will be return to the sea. However, the speaker explains that the remained salt will be counted as threaten to human beings' life, owing to the fact that it contains harmful chemical substances like Selenium; if this dangerous component releases to the air, people would not be able to breath correctly.
Second, the author proclaims that mixing the Pacific Ocean water with the water in Salton Sea can easily decrease the salt level by piping and canal systems, because of being lower salty. Yet again, the lecturer underscores that never do local government have enough budget for constructing the mentioned transporting system; distance between these two locations, approximately a hundred kilometeres, is long enough to require much allocated money.
The final point of contention between the reading and the listening passage is dividing the Sea by several constructed walls. The writer thinks that by this method the whole sea will be divided into three parts, and the main and largest parts will be controlled and prohibited from any salt level increase. On the other hand, the speaker explains that this strategy will be useful in short-term horizons; many natural disasters like eqrthquakes can easily break the walls and the separated water will be mixed again with the other regions. Thus, separating walls cannot be practical in the long run.
- To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities. Us 73
- tpo 46 independent task 3
- Integrated Writing Task In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s no to suppress natural forest fires. The “let it burn” policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much dama 83
- TPO 33 Integrated Writing Task 42
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...lt will be counted as threaten to human beings life, owing to the fact that it contain...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 601, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ls cannot be practical in the long run.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, second, so, thus, well, as to, in short, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1638.0 1373.03311258 119% => OK
No of words: 309.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30097087379 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55350675115 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598705501618 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.5634195529 49.2860985944 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.909090909 110.228320801 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0909090909 21.698381199 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.06452816374 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185161620697 0.272083759551 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738466877211 0.0996497079465 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611404947048 0.0662205650399 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119280861699 0.162205337803 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0169448903023 0.0443174109184 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.3589403974 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 53.8541721854 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.42419426049 115% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 63.6247240618 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.