The line graph provided compares the number audiences of radio and television throughout a day in UK in 1992.
Overall, there were more TV audiences than the radio ones during the day. It is obvious that UK people preferred listening to the radio in the morning, whereas watching TV was the more suitable choice in the evening.
At the beginning, the number of audiences of television and radio received approximately 7% and 3% respectively, which TV viewers noticeably accounted for a higher percentage. Following that, both numbers slightly declined to nearly 2.5% at 2 o’clock then came with a small increase to meet each other at around 5% at 6.00 a.m. At the next hours, it is clear that audiences preferred listening to radio to watching TV programmes when the number of radio listeners surpassed that of TV to hit the peak at about 27% at 8, then suddenly decreased to stood at 15% at 1.00 p.m. On the other hand, after some fluctuations, the percentage of TV viewers became great in amount and quickly caught up with that of radio at 1.00 p.m.
Then it continuously increased and climbed up to the top at approximately 45% at 9 o’clock in the evening while the number for radio audiences steadily dropped to 15% at the same point of time. It was not to last when late at night, people became less favorable with these two kinds of entertainment. The numbers showed that after 9.00 o’clock, the percentage of audiences in common experienced a reduction which remained 17% for TV and 4% for radio at midnight.
- The line graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992 67
- The graph below shows the number of complaints made about noise to Environmental Health authorities in the city of Newtown between 1980 and 1996.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The table below shows sales made by a coffee shop in an office building on a typical weekday. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000. 73
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types between 2000 and 2009. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1277.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 265.0 196.424390244 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81886792453 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87834749474 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528301886792 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 22.4926829268 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 221.383589901 43.030603864 514% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 182.428571429 112.824112599 162% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.8571428571 22.9334400587 165% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21099087184 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158574381218 0.103423049105 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.180797219922 0.0843802449381 214% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221169725927 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.208171602381 0.0819641961636 254% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.2 13.2329268293 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 61.2550243902 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.27 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.9970731707 153% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.