Do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well.
What people do in their lives, is the most controvertible debate. Although it may seem exaggerated, at first sight, noticing the world is ruled now, one may find this contention sensible. In this regard, many people are inclined toward this opinion that because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well. I am of the opinion that being well in a specific field is indispensable and reasonable.
The first reason which makes me hold this belief that doing the few things well is necessary is the expansion. What caused the people not capable of doing different things is the different fields of science. Many subjects with sub-topics provide a wide range of knowledge. So, despite the past, a person cannot do many different things. For example, in the past, it would be rather easier for one person to afford different fields of science solely and being expertise in it. Many epitomes can mention as a prodigy of science like, Aristotle which was expertise in many majors and his books are useful and valuable now. But, nowadays, it couldn’t be possible to be an expert in different fields or even be able to do different things at the same time.
Another equally noteworthy reason to bear in mind is that being well in one area is more reasonable than doing different things. In fact, in this era human beings live noticeably is influenced by proficiency. Evidently, specialization becomes the most important key factor for successful living. Besides, people now are more informed about the importance of time, so they try to efficiently use the time. Therefore, for the majority of people spending time in different areas not only is waste of the time in somehow but also does not provide them the required specialization. Different areas, bring them mediocrity which is out of value these days. Besides, noticing the common lifestyles it is not necessary. Although critics debate that many people are experts in different fields, the distribution of these individuals among the public is totally rare and assumed as the nobility of societies. Also, hectic life prevents people to do different things. Thus, neither people's preferences nor current circumstances encourage people to do different things.
To summarize, all contemplating remarks we safely conclude that being well in one area is beneficial and necessary, besides regarding lifestyles and individuals preferences it is inevitable that people try to gain more expertise in one field.
- Imagine that your city government has given permission for a major company to build a large factory near your neighborhood. Do you think this is a good idea? Why or why not? 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Compared with people who live in urban areas, the people who live in rural areas can take better care of their families. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Universities should spend more money on improving facilities (eg. labs and general equipment) than on hiring famous professors. 86
- Which kind of universities do you prefer, universities whose graduates can find good jobs or universities where there are famous professors? 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Colleges or Universities should offer more courses to prepare students for the future before they start working. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 288, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...n that because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well. I...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eld is indispensable and reasonable. The first reason which makes me hold thi...
^^^^
Line 5, column 315, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...o, despite the past, a person cannot do many different things. For example, in the past, it wo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o different things at the same time. Another equally noteworthy reason to bea...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ourage people to do different things. To summarize, all contemplating remarks...
^^^^
Line 13, column 14, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...do different things. To summarize, all contemplating remarks we safely conc...
^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to gain more expertise in one field.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 15.1003584229 192% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2102.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 408.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15196078431 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82081756345 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53431372549 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 666.9 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3155945392 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5454545455 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5454545455 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27272727273 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.39435444038 0.236089414692 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124372047487 0.076458572812 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135928836692 0.0737576698707 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241294085464 0.150856017488 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128465522111 0.0645574589148 199% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.