The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The line chart provides information about the number of greenhouse gas production individually (measured in metric tonnes) in four different European countries (UK, Sweden, Italy and Portugal) in 4 decades (from 1967 to 2007).
Overall, there was an increasing trend in the average of CO2 emissions in italy and Portugal, while the remaining nations witnessed a downward figure. Also, Britain accounted for the highest figure during the period.
In the first year, the figure of greenhouse gas emitted in italy and Portugal showed similar patterns, while the former accounted just above 4 and the latter just was just below 2. In the following decades, the number of both countries observed an upward trend and finished the period just below 8 and 6 respectively.
Carbon dioxide emitted in the United Kingdom stood just below 11 in 1967, following which the figure experienced a moderate decrease and finished the period at almost 2 declines that of initial year in 2007. Sweden, however, saw a dramatic rise in the first decade, from about 8.5 metric tonnes in 1967 to more than 10 metric tonnes in 1977, and dropped exponentially in next 3 decades, and then, it ended at similar level that of Portugal in the last recorded year.
- The graph below shows the consumption of three spreads from 1981 to 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- People participate in 6 difference English Course in pare, 2016 73
- Some people feel that boarding school (where students live at the school during the term) are excellent option for children, while other people disagree. Consider both side of the debate and reach a conclusion. 61
- When choosing a job, the salary is the most important consideration.To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge. 78
- some people get into debt by buying things they don't need and cant afford.what are the reasons for this behaviors?what action can be taken to prevent people from having this problem? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1036.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05365853659 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6139970101 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570731707317 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.794349305 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.0 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2857142857 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242009626605 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0962832642272 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645488150177 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128921063056 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325015924112 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.