it is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts more than it is for them to learn facts
Education has attracted much social concern. Many educators around the world argue that it is crucial for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts. Personally, I disagree with this argument.
On the one hand, work performance draws much of my attention. It is widely known that learning facts create a chance for students to see the ideas and concepts in a realistic way. Therefore, it is possible for students to understand deeply these ideas and concepts. Hence, they are likely to improve their knowledge background which is very good for them in the future. As a result, their work performance is highly likely to be improved. More interestingly, learning facts also is a good way to remember. Thus, there is a likelihood for the student to remember much of the knowledge that is from a variety of areas. As a consequence, they stand a golden chance to improve their work performance. Without a doubt, learning facts brings to the students many benefits.
On the other hand, it is claimed that learning facts always make students too tired which leads to the decline in their interest in learning. However, this is just applicable to a minority. With the development of technology, students have many ways to entertain and relax. Therefore, they are likely to release their mental burden. Furthermore, learning facts helps students consider problems in an interesting way. Thus, it encourages students to try hard and pay more attention to learning. As a result, students are motivated at learning which leads to an increase in their interest in learning. Beyond any doubt, by learn facts, students are more engaged at learning.
All in all, work performance, interest in learning, are convincing reasons for my argument. It is highly recommended that people should carefully consider my writing to make the right decision on this issue.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the internet. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Overall, the widespread use of the internet has a mostly positive effect on life in today's world. 60
- Task: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way totravel without a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support youranswer 70
- some parents give their children money for each high grade they get in school 60
- Many people believe that formal "pen and paper" examinations are not the best method of asessing education achievement. Discuss this view and give your own opinion. 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a realistic way" with adverb for "realistic"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... students to see the ideas and concepts in a realistic way. Therefore, it is possible for students...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 395, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an interesting way" with adverb for "interesting"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... facts helps students consider problems in an interesting way. Thus, it encourages students to try ha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, however, so, therefore, thus, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 311.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06752411576 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81745794859 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 212.727598566 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488745980707 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 477.0 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.5679850851 48.9658058833 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 71.6363636364 100.406767564 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1363636364 20.6045352989 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90909090909 5.45110844103 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409887670089 0.236089414692 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109061098019 0.076458572812 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119067218441 0.0737576698707 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234827493726 0.150856017488 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124424927561 0.0645574589148 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 58.1214874552 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.53 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 86.8835125448 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.