In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.
For a progress to materialize, many factors and elements have to come together and collaborate. Different fields and subjects, according to their nature and characteristics, might need a range of prerequisites to flourish and reach better result. Discussion and holding discourse is among factors of progress in a number of these fields.
In some fields in academics, jobs or politics, discussion can have a critical role. In parliaments, commissions and assemblies around the globe, people convene to share their ideas and sentiments to reach a decent conclusion or agreement upon which new bills are passed and better condition can be sought. Constitutions in democratic nations are the result of shared opinions of elites gathering delicately to discuss and share their experiences and ideals to chart a better future for their society and country. This has been true all through the history from far in the past when cavemen took shelter in the evening, after their arduous day of foraging in the bush to share their observations and plan for their next day's search and hunt. And has continued all through the millennia and centuries till now which governments come together in United Nation or other international conferences to discuss about the most important global matters such as peace or environmental remits such as global warming. But is discourse the absolute requisite of progress in all fields and subjects?
Many fields of study such as metaphysics and literature are more individual based. Although discourse in these fields can also be productive and helpful for students and researchers. So you can see peripatetic pupils of Aristotle walking with him for hours between the trees in the garden to discuss logic and philosophy, but on the other hand you can see others reaching enlightenment and edification by taking refuge in austerity and isolation such as Buddha beneath the tree or Muhammad the prophet in the cave and changing the world afterward. Heidegger the great existentialist philosopher shaped the gist of his ideas and concepts by walking lonely in the black forest, South Germany or Firdausi the great lyric poet of Persia wrote his great book of Shahnameh describing antiquated Iranian myths and legends during his 30 years of solitude in his far-flung home village around city of Tabas, Khorasan.
And now we are in the age of technology and internet. Researcher and academics can reach for copious sources of data and information inside the net through websites and webpages. Here also discussion has opened its way through webinars and social media. Many come here to discuss and share ideas but on the other hand you might not be the guy of that type. You can benefit a lot by perusing over Wikipedia and other information based websites or browse through YouTube to find anything you might need without any need to talk to anybody.
Before ending the discourse I would like to broach another related point: does discussion with anybody at any time necessarily lead to more decent results. For a great decision to make, it is important to determine whom you are discussing to and under what circumstances you are doing so. Malevolent and obstreperous consultants have a distinctive place in history of rule and royalty. Those who with their malicious or sometimes wrong counseling's did great harms to their majesty or the people.
Holding discourses around topics decision-making has a particular role in improve results by sharing an assortment of ideas and sentiments but this is might not be true in all occasions, anytime, anywhere and with any one. A sharp mind decides when to consult, what topic to discuss about and with whom to share opinions with.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-29 | Seonghun | 83 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | cnegus | 58 | view |
| 2019-11-20 | jessie_llj | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | melavdev | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-05 | jdpatel1107 | 50 | view |
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. 16
- In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view. 83
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could 12
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 66
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 53
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 5, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'progress'.
Suggestion: progress
For a progress to materialize, many factors and elemen...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 334, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n be sought. Constitutions in democratic nations are the result of shared opinion...
^^
Line 21, column 215, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
...l occasions, anytime, anywhere and with any one. A sharp mind decides when to consult, ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 53.0 14.8657303371 357% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 103.0 58.6224719101 176% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3116.0 2235.4752809 139% => OK
No of words: 607.0 442.535393258 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1334431631 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.96360453597 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8338722531 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 322.0 215.323595506 150% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530477759473 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 968.4 704.065955056 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 84.5241172027 60.3974514979 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.833333333 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2916666667 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.875 5.21951772744 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127727472639 0.243740707755 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.039930414768 0.0831039109588 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417357555316 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0718966267039 0.150359130593 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438749910257 0.0667264976115 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 165.0 100.480337079 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.