The Average Household Expenditures by Major Categories
The pie chart showed the average of household expenditures in 2010 by two different countries that are Japan and Malaysia. There are five categories of household expenditure.
In Japan the highest was transport which covered almost third part at that year. Below that there is food and services which have almost similar value of percentage was 21% and 20%. At the bottom there is health care with just 6% of expenditures.
Malaysia has a diffrence than Japan which housing at the top covered near half part of total with 34% value. And the second was food which covered more than fourth part of all. Next list there is other goods and services which just 1% below that value was 26%. Then, the little expenditures in this country was health care which just around 3%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | trinhthanh1 | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- Advantage and Disadvantage for Young People Work Early 73
- Replaced Things That Use to Be Done in Home by Hand with Machines 73
- It is Better For Children to Begin Learning a Foreign Language at Primary School than Secondary School 61
- Advantage and Disadvantage of Raising Petrol Prices 73
- The Average Household Expenditures by Major Categories 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 189, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are other goods'?
Suggestion: there are other goods
...more than fourth part of all. Next list there is other goods and services which just 1% below that v...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, then, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 650.0 965.302439024 67% => OK
No of words: 134.0 196.424390244 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85074626866 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.40232815919 3.73543355544 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35755942311 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582089552239 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 187.2 283.868780488 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.2695806665 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 72.2222222222 112.824112599 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8888888889 22.9334400587 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55555555556 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125044135897 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682699620904 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11085164432 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136478637456 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.173712814659 0.0819641961636 212% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.81 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 21.0 40.7170731707 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.