Plan A shows a heath centre in 2005. Plan B shows the same place in the present day.
A glance at the provided plans reveals the changes in a health center from 2005 to now.
On balance, the increase in the size of car parking is the most noticeable change; moreover, there are some new facilities in the present day.
Looking at the information in more details, at present, the size of parking lot expanded from 12 spaces to 30 spaces, whereas the garden was scaled down to a smaller quantity. In terms of structure of the building, the opening door was shifted into the west in lieu of the south in 2005, and the reception was also moved from the center to the position near entrance.
There are some extra sectors newly introduced, including minor operations room, CR3, CR4, and playground for children. Furthermore, the seating area in the center was developed both size and quantity; conversely, the dimensions of CR1 was narrowed during the period. Last but not least is about the unchange of physiotherapy room in the north-east of the map.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-25 | junjunh | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | Mario Nese | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | Mario Nese | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-24 | Max Ryan | 56 | view |
| 2019-06-20 | Alex Christian | 67 | view |
- Please briefly state your scientific and professional interests and objectives, as well as your career goals. Include a description of your past accomplishments that are not evident from the examination of other documents submitted. Report your results, i 59
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 89
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion What sort of punishment should parents and t 75
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 73
- Please briefly state your scientific and professional interests and objectives, as well as your career goals. Include a description of your past accomplishments that are not evident from the examination of other documents submitted. Report your results, i 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, furthermore, if, look, moreover, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 805.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84939759036 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65342812141 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632530120482 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5747766325 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 5.23603664747 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0826992214936 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0379191831615 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469748750347 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0619288408456 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501121584488 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.