THE LINE GRAPH ILLUSTRATE AVERAGE CO2 EMISSION PER PERSON IN FOUR DIFFERENT COUNTRIES IN BETWEEN 1967 TO 2007 IN GENERAL WITHIN GIVEN 40 YEARS KINGDOM AND SWEDEN CO2 EMISSION PER PERSON WAS DECLINED, ITALY AND PORTUGAL CO2 EMISSION WAS INCREASED
WHEN CONSIDER 1967 TO 1977 DECADE APART FROM UNITED KINGDOM OTHER THREE COUNTRIES CO2 EMISSION WAS INCREASED. ITALY AND SWEDEN HAD SAME UP TREND GRADIENT OVER THE DECADE HOWEVER WITHIN NEXT DECADE 1972 TO 1987 FREQUENCY CO2 EMISSION WAS REDUCED BY MORE THAN METRIC TONS PER PERSON MEANWHILE PORTUGAL AND ITALY CO2 EMISSION WAS CONTINUOUSLY INCREASED AFTER 3.5 METRIC TON AND 7 METRIC TONNES RESPECTIVELY. BY THE END OF THE DECADE IN 1987 SWEDEN AND ITALY CO2 EMISSION WAS 7 METRIC TONNES PER PERSON WITHIN 1987 TO 1997 DECADE PORTUGAL HAS SHOWED HIGHEST RATE OF INCREMENT OF CO2 EMISSION HOWEVER IN 1997 TO 2017 ITALY CO2 EMISSION WAS NOT CHANGED AND PORTUGAL ALSO HAS BEEN ABLE TO CONTROL THEIR CO2 EMISSION. HOWEVER, THE UNITED KINGDOM CO2 EMISSION WAS CONTINUOUSLY DECREASED OVER THE TIME PERIOD BUT THE UNITED KINGDOM HAS THE HIGHEST CO2 EMISSION OVER 40 YEARS
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the Information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons whee relevant. 56
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the Information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons whee relevant. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 34, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
THE LINE GRAPH ILLUSTRATE AVERAGE CO2 EMISSION PER PERSON IN FOUR DIFFEREN...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “WHEN” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... PORTUGAL CO2 EMISSION WAS INCREASED WHEN CONSIDER 1967 TO 1977 DECADE APART FROM...
^^^^
Line 3, column 540, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'SHOWED the HIGHEST'.
Suggestion: SHOWED the HIGHEST
...WITHIN 1987 TO 1997 DECADE PORTUGAL HAS SHOWED HIGHEST RATE OF INCREMENT OF CO2 EMISSION HOWEV...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while, apart from, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 931.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00537634409 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38145341837 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467741935484 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 46.0 22.4926829268 205% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.8814865432 43.030603864 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 232.75 112.824112599 206% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 46.5 22.9334400587 203% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 14.25 5.23603664747 272% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286200978802 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.196457304228 0.103423049105 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699369690296 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277914869134 0.15604864568 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536676449884 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 25.4 13.2329268293 192% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.25 61.2550243902 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.1 10.3012195122 195% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.67 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 26.0 11.4329268293 227% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 20.4 10.9970731707 186% => OK
text_standard: 26.0 11.0658536585 235% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.