There has been a rise in the support for uniform national curriculum over the past years. While it is true that, the current system of different curriculum provides more flexiibility to the parents, to choose the curriculum in accordance with the needs of their wards and their resource constraint(good curriculum schools such as CBSE, ICSE board are way more costly than state boards), this system is not devoid of flaws. The primary flaw being that such curriculum differences make comparing students for college admissions difficult. In this passage we outline why we support a unified curriculum policy.
To further illustrate this point, lets take an example of Delhi university in India, which admits sttudents on the basis of their high school performance. So, the primary requirement for entering such colleges is high scores. But some state boards like maharashtra and bihar board are notoriously famous for giving students low mark, whereas tamilnadu board is known to be more generous ith marks. often the highest marks in maharashta board fail to meet the cutoff requirements, which explains the high incidence of tamil board students compared to other state boards in Delhi university. But these students are often subjected to a less rigorous curriculum and often fail to cope up with the rigour of the college, which calls for a uniform curriculum requirement for the students.
While the above argument could also point a flaw at incorrect testing requirement for entering college, i.e. a standardised test could be the criteria than high school performance, but that does not ddress the primary problems of differences in knowledge owing to diffrerent curriculum. A uniform curriculum can also help ensure that students across the nation are subjected to the same standards and are provided equal footing in some sense. A uniform curriculum with a little flexibility say for example in language subjects, which are often a source of criticism against uniform national curriculum, could ensure that children are comparable while entering the college, and do not miss out on entering college just because they do not have enough resources to get into a good curriculum for their schooling.
A competitive world where people are allowed to make the school curriculum choices for their kids based on their needs and resources could in theory prove to better than the restrictive uniform national curriculum, but in practice this flexibility often results in a very varied curriculum for students, and also could lead to providing them substandard skills in comparison to college requirements. one way out could be to institute a common test pre-college enrollment to judge students, while such a system has a merit towards pushing curriculums to unify in accoradance with the needs of the said test, such a system could be very costly, so a common curriculum with some flexibility is desirable
There has been a rise in the support for uniform national curriculum over the past years. While it is true that, the current system of different curriculum provides more flexiibility to the parents, to choose the curriculum in accordance with the needs of their wards and their resource constraint(good curriculum schools such as CBSE, ICSE board are way more costly than state boards), this system is not devoid of flaws. The primary flaw being that such curriculum differences make comparing students for college admissions difficult. In this passage we outline why we support a unified curriculum policy.
To further illustrate this point, lets take an example of Delhi university in India, which admits sttudents on the basis of their high school performance. So, the primary requirement for entering such colleges is high scores. But some state boards like maharashtra and bihar board are notoriously famous for giving students low mark, whereas tamilnadu board is known to be more generous ith marks. often the highest marks in maharashta board fail to meet the cutoff requirements, which explains the high incidence of tamil board students compared to other state boards in Delhi university. But these students are often subjected to a less rigorous curriculum and often fail to cope up with the rigour of the college, which calls for a uniform curriculum requirement for the students.
While the above argument could also point a flaw at incorrect testing requirement for entering college, i.e. a standardised test could be the criteria than high school performance, but that does not ddress the primary problems of differences in knowledge owing to diffrerent curriculum. A uniform curriculum can also help ensure that students across the nation are subjected to the same standards and are provided equal footing in some sense. A uniform curriculum with a little flexibility say for example in language subjects, which are often a source of criticism against uniform national curriculum, could ensure that children are comparable while entering the college, and do not miss out on entering college just because they do not have enough resources to get into a good curriculum for their schooling.
A competitive world where people are allowed to make the school curriculum choices for their kids based on their needs and resources could in theory prove to better than the restrictive uniform national curriculum, but in practice this flexibility often results in a very varied curriculum for students, and also could lead to providing them substandard skills in comparison to college requirements. one way out could be to institute a common test pre-college enrollment to judge students, while such a system has a merit towards pushing curriculums to unify in accoradance with the needs of the said test, such a system could be very costly, so a common curriculum with some flexibility is desirable
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 58
- "Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sendin 48
- "The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition."-Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agre 34
- The true test of the greatness of a work of art is its ability to be understood by the masses.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address th 66
- " Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. " 66
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 467 350
No. of Characters: 2402 1500
No. of Different Words: 224 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.649 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.143 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.764 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 171 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 135 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 98 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 68 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 35.923 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 20.451 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.692 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.378 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.582 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.129 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 41, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...There has been a rise in the support for uniform national curriculum over the pas...
^^
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e it is true that, the current system of different curriculum provides more flexi...
^^
Line 5, column 399, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Often
...is known to be more generous ith marks. often the highest marks in maharashta board f...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 455, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t marks in maharashta board fail to meet the cutoff requirements, which explains ...
^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...od curriculum for their schooling. A competitive world where people are allo...
^
Line 11, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... for their kids based on their needs and resources could in theory prove to bette...
^^
Line 11, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ces could in theory prove to better than the restrictive uniform national curricu...
^^
Line 11, column 403, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
... in comparison to college requirements. one way out could be to institute a common ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, whereas, while, for example, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.6327345309 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 11.1786427146 98% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 28.8173652695 73% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 55.5748502994 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 16.3942115768 61% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2450.0 2260.96107784 108% => OK
No of words: 467.0 441.139720559 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24625267666 5.12650576532 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.56307096286 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82637725756 2.78398813304 102% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 204.123752495 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496788008565 0.468620217663 106% => OK
syllable_count: 772.2 705.55239521 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.67365269461 358% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.8473053892 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 107.169163437 57.8364921388 185% => OK
Chars per sentence: 175.0 119.503703932 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.3571428571 23.324526521 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78571428571 5.70786347227 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 5.25449101796 152% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.462590753492 0.218282227539 212% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174823997244 0.0743258471296 235% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.159526219879 0.0701772020484 227% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.314845077977 0.128457276422 245% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.198761567656 0.0628817314937 316% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 14.3799401198 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.52 48.3550499002 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 12.197005988 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.5979740519 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.32208582834 106% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 98.500998004 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 12.3882235529 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.1389221557 136% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.