The article states that kind of a device that is provided for sea turtles to survive them from shrimp fishers due to their damage to these species during their activity, but the author provides three critiques to state his idea about the patent . However, the professor refutes each of three aspects, which were mentioned in the reading.
First, the article asserts that TED is evitable because fishing practices are not harmful for turtles notably. Which means, only about one turtle would be influenced every month by these works. However, the professor refutes the idea, and says shrimp fishing industry harms these animals in an anourmous size, some thing about 1000 turtles, which is not a small size of damage to these animals.
Second, the author claims that shortening the time of fishing could be more influencing than using the TED as a method for protection. In contrast, the professor opposes the author's reason and believes that it is hard for government to monitor thousends of fishing boats in this industry. Furthermore, the current method should be much esier.
third, the article asserts that TED method is not effective enough. However the professor refutes that this device can modify and get bigger however it is small basically.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use specific reasons and examples to supp 73
- ReadingStandardized tests are exams given to students at the end of each academic year. The results are used to determine whether or not students move to the next grade level. As our society places more emphasis on education, many school districts, along 85
- summarize 3
- TPO 37 Integrated writing 3
- Do you agree or disagree with this statement? successful people try new thing and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well.use reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 25, Rule ID: KIND_OF_A[1]
Message: Don't include 'a' after a classification term. Use simply 'kind of'.
Suggestion: kind of
The article states that kind of a device that is provided for sea turtles...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 245, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...iques to state his idea about the patent . However, the professor refutes each of ...
^^
Line 3, column 311, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'something'?
Suggestion: something
...rms these animals in an anourmous size, some thing about 1000 turtles, which is not a smal...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Third
...current method should be much esier. third, the article asserts that TED method is...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 69, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...hat TED method is not effective enough. However the professor refutes that this device ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, third, in contrast, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1053.0 1373.03311258 77% => OK
No of words: 206.0 270.72406181 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11165048544 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37928468014 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601941747573 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 419.366225166 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.8339000933 49.2860985944 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.3 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7 7.06452816374 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.