The charts below show degrees granted in different fields at the National University in the years 1995, 2005, and 2015.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
This pie chart illustrates about the differences in degrees of fields that students take at the National University. This information will be provided in 3 different years in 1995, 2005 and 2015. There are 4 different subjects of field that students take, there are computer science, medicine, business, and law. All of this area there are increasing and decreasing amount of students that choose.
In 1995, business and computer science were the most popular course that student took, it calculated about 30 percent of each field. 10 years later, business population were decreased 10 percent than before and 40 percent of population took computer science population. In the last year, there was 2015, there was additional 5 percent of scholar who took computer science, nevertheless, business field was deducted 5 percent to 15 percent of them took this range.
On the other hand, in 1995 medicine and law were less favorite than 2 of other fields. There were counted 25 percent took medicine and another 15 percent studied law. Throughout 10 years, medicine students became 30 and law students were slopped to 10 percent. At the end of 2015, law field population were rose to 15 percent and medicine populated reduce 5 percent.
In summary, for 20 years of National University students were calculated, the most favorable was computer science and less popular were business and law field. In the future, the trend of computer science and medicine students are increasing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-10 | mohammad.iraf | 11 | view |
| 2019-10-30 | cindycornelia98 | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 75
- The cgar below shows the total number of minutes in billions of teephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 61
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portion of fruit and vegetabls per day in UK ftom 2001 to 2008 78
- The two maps below show read access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reorting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A,B and C over four different seasons. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nevertheless, in summary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1252.0 965.302439024 130% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19502074689 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65842044384 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473029045643 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 364.5 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7323260758 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3076923077 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5384615385 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.61538461538 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134600284947 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663561603785 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076619829973 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100331846203 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.07458834067 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.