Some people think that using Facebook is not good. Do you agree or disagree?
Some people think that spending time surfing Facebook is unnecessary while others believe that it is good. From my point of view, I totally agree that surf Facebook has bad impact on people.
To begin with, surfing facebook can waste people’s time. They don’t focus on study or worf. When people always take their smartphone on their hand everywhere and everywhen, they may no interact with other people, everyone, even family members. They spend too much time playing facebook and they have less time to do other activities such as playing sports, doing exercises, and so on. For example, surfing facebook too frequently will make them tired because the time they sleep is limited.
Another reason worth mentioning is that playing facebook can be influenced by many people. When they post a picture or a status, many people may comment disrespectfully that will affect their mood. Besides, some people may be involved in some problems which are not related to them. Furthermore, many wrong informations are misunderstanded about some people or some things, that harm them. For instance, someone can show some private photos of another person which he or she wants everyone not to see them. They can be depressed and may tend to think negatively.
In conclusion, I strongly agree that playing facebook can harm to people. They can be affected both physically and mentally.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-22 | zanzendegi | 67 | view |
| 2024-12-22 | zanzendegi | 67 | view |
| 2024-12-22 | zanzendegi | 67 | view |
| 2024-12-22 | zanzendegi | 67 | view |
| 2024-12-22 | zanzendegi | 67 | view |
- Some people think that using Facebook is not good Do you agree or disagree 82
- Advantages and disadvantages of living in the city. 56
- The bar chart below shows the different types of accommodation chosen by the British when they went on holiday in 2012. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The bar chart below shows the different types of accommodation chosen by the British when they went on holiday in 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The bar graph shows the global sales (in billions of dollars) of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, may, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 41.998997996 45% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1165.0 1615.20841683 72% => OK
No of words: 227.0 315.596192385 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13215859031 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63872607031 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612334801762 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 353.7 506.74238477 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.1084125814 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.6666666667 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1333333333 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244511597733 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885555584193 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741121322593 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160405331208 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0756019693867 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.88 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 78.4519038076 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.