Friends are one of the important factor in our lives because they influenced us more than our parents do. Therefore, making good Friends will make better future and increase quality of life. In this sense, according to my personal belief, I would choose both intelligent friends and friends with sense of humor. I feel this way for several reasons, which I will explore in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, being with intelligent students would improve our knowledge because we can share our thoughts and we can recognize our weaknesses by talking with them. Since brilliant students always focus on their goals, people around them develop their future by following their paths. My personal experience is bolstered my claim, which I was made it in here. When I first enter to the college I found friends who play video games. Since I spent more time with them, I used to play video games with them without focusing on my academics which lead me to fail in the mid semester exam. However, with the encouragemnt given by teachers I used to spend time with more intelligent ones in our class, and that might be the main reason to pass the end semester exams well. For this reason, intelligent friends can influenced us for the better future.
Secondly, In the same time people need to have friends with sense of humour to enjoy their lives. In some cases intelligent students may not have experinced their life, and therefore they cannot have self satisfaction. As a human being we all need to live successfully and live happily. In this case, if people around us are very serious and haven't any sense of humour they cannot be with happily. For instance, my friend kamani is very intelligent, but her family and life was a mess. Moreover, this happened because she was too serious on every aspects and she cannot bear with humors or problems. In this scenario, to get away from these kind of characteristics it is important to have humorous friends.
In conclusion, I agree with the idea that having both kind of friends will be better than choosing one type of freinds. This is because intelligent ones make our lives successful and in the same time joyful persons give the happiness to our lives.
- Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning. 50
- Pro's and con's of driverless cars 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to make friends with intelligent people than with the people who have a good sense of humor. 70
- technology has made children less creative than children in the past. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: "A person should never make an important decision alone." 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 363, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... my claim, which I was made it in here. When I first enter to the college I found fr...
^^^^
Line 5, column 343, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...f people around us are very serious and havent any sense of humour they cannot be with...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 636, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...ems. In this scenario, to get away from these kind of characteristics it is important to h...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, as to, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, kind of, in some cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1832.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 382.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79581151832 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52464077146 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523560209424 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2355750731 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.45110844103 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368505083702 0.236089414692 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105834710025 0.076458572812 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798101327248 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226782204147 0.150856017488 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0189820983672 0.0645574589148 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.