The chart shows the numbers of tourists to Phu Quoc in the years from 2012 to 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The chart shows the numbers of tourists to Phu Quoc in the years from 2012 to 2015.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The graph shows the figure of travelers to Phu Quoc between the year from 2012 to 2015.

Overall, both total and foreign tourists to Phu Quoc went up stably in three years.

First of all, total tourists arrivals grew up rapidly from the year 2012 to 2015. In 2012, there were about 300,000 people came to Phu Quoc. But, the tourists sharply increased in 2013, the figure was 600,000 which was double of tourists in year 2012. Until 2014, the number of tourists reached by 1 million. It grew up 400,000 in 1 year. Next, in 2015, tourists rapidly went up from 1,000,000 to 1,500,000.

In addition, foreign tourist arrivals in the year 2012 to 2014 slowly increased, the number tourists from about 100,000 to 200,000 people. This number was stable in 2015, it still be 200,000 foreign tourists came to Phu Quoc.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-11-14 Hoangnhi 73 view
2019-11-09 KhangVTran 56 view
2019-11-04 ngothithunguyet 56 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by user ngothithunguyet :
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The graph shows the figure of travelers ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... between the year from 2012 to 2015. Overall, both total and foreign tourists...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Quoc went up stably in three years. First of all, total tourists arrivals gr...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...went up from 1,000,000 to 1,500,000. In addition, foreign tourist arrivals in...
^^^^
Line 7, column 185, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...his number was stable in 2015, it still be 200,000 foreign tourists came to Phu Qu...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, still, in addition, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 675.0 965.302439024 70% => OK
No of words: 143.0 196.424390244 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72027972028 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.45807182446 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.16954590507 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 74.0 106.607317073 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517482517483 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 159.3 283.868780488 56% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.5699142456 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 67.5 112.824112599 60% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.3 22.9334400587 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292052983657 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146413320389 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0702570965948 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215413181843 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0737182072834 0.0819641961636 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.0 13.2329268293 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 99.56 61.2550243902 163% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 2.9 10.3012195122 28% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.5 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.1 8.06136585366 76% => OK
difficult_words: 16.0 40.7170731707 39% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.4329268293 44% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.