Speaking in a foreign language by living in a foreign country not only cause intense social problems but also it can create daily life problems.
First of all, to speak in a foreign language a person has to understand and imbibe the language's syllable, grammar and the ritual manner of that country. It has a huge chance to lost his motherland historical ritual that affects his social behavior. Besides, in a foreign language a person feel uncomfortable to proper his opinion perfectly and freely. Furthermore, some social behavior or manner is reproachable in one country comparing to another country or region. For example, in Indian sub-continent calling professor by his name is ascribe to be as a heinous social behavior. But it is common and regularly used in western country like USA, UK and Canada. Additionally, with the loss of social manner it also effects on local or native music, play, drama such as Folk music, Jatra gan etc.
On the other hand, talking in a foreign language also has daily life problems which may be faced by a person at the time of communication to the local people. Adaptation with these people is tough because the foreign language is not learned by instinctively. Which is learned through course or communicating with these people. Hence, they have to face many regular problems while communicating with the native people. For instance, ordering food in a restaurant, buy ticket for transportation in bus or train are the problems which are always faced by non-native speaker in a foreign country. As a result, the consequences of adopting foreign language is deleterious for both social behavior and practical cause.
In conclusion, living at overseas country and speaking these countries language could create social problems and cause practical problems.
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisions where relevant. 67
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment. 73
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.What is the cause? What can be done about this problem? 73
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'languages'' or 'language's'?
Suggestion: languages'; language's
...person has to understand and imbibe the languages syllable, grammar and the ritual manner...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 540, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'ascribed'.
Suggestion: ascribed
...tinent calling professor by his name is ascribe to be as a heinous social behavior. But...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 714, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th social behavior and practical cause. In conclusion, living at overseas countr...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 62, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
... at overseas country and speaking these countries language could create social problems a...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1511.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13945578231 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88329663917 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510204081633 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.834804433 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.733333333 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2666666667 7.06120827912 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368345595733 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125273627444 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135023952116 0.0667982634062 202% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.305194406494 0.151304729494 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.145910326333 0.056905535591 256% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.