Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Companies should pay for employees to get a university degree.
Today, managers wonder whether it would be better to pay for their employees to get a university degree or not. In my opinion, they should pay their employees to get a university degree because it would encourage them to increase their knowledge level which eventually would affect the knowledge level of society. Moreover, this helps managers to decrease the risk of hiring new educated employees for their needs. I will illustrate my reasons in the following paragraphs.
First, paying to employees for further education leads to an increase in education level in society. Indeed, all societies are trying to increase the level of knowledge of their peoples because knowledge is the main factor that affects which country developed more than others. Thus, managers who play one of the most important roles in each society have a significant task to encourage people toward more education. Therefore, paying employees to get a university degree is one of the things that managers do for increasing the education level of society. For instance, according to the statistical review that I read before, if you compare the most developed countries of the world with the least ones, it is obvious that developed ones have more educated people than those which is not developed. Furthermore, by a simple search through the internet, you can understand there is a lot of budgets that are available for managers to pay for funding other people include their employees for further education.
Second, this helps managers to decrease the risk of new employees. Indeed, each organization may need someone who has an education degree in a specific major. Thus, they have two options, hiring new educated employees or paying their present employees to get a university degree. However, hiring new ones always is risky for managers, but present approved employees who are familiar with everything in the organization and proved themselves before are a better option. For example, 5 years ago, the company that my brother worked in it, decided to hire a few new educated employees by taking some exams. After a while, although they hired their new staff after taking several exams, they had to fire two of them because they didn’t have work commitment at all and they didn’t do their tasks well. Therefore, managers decided to pay some of their approved staff to get a university degree that one of them was my brother. Consequently, they succeed to get their degrees in two years and now they are doing their tasks perfectly and managers are happy with their decision.
Based on the aforementioned reasons, it can be concluded that paying employees for further education would be a better idea.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve internet access to public transportation. 66
- tpo 30 80
- Write a letter to the manager of the Lost and Found department of the railway regarding the luggage you accidentally left on the train In your letter give the details of your train trip describe the luggage you left on the train say what actions you want 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Companies should pay for employees to get a university degree. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The most important characteristic to a successful politician or leader is good communication skills. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2255.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 443.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09029345372 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70223997869 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.444695259594 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 702.9 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.310368741 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.684210526 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3157894737 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.31578947368 5.45110844103 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262991171706 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0959392341908 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747379713114 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165947274882 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384838126073 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.