This line graphs compose the change of size of Antarctica ozone hole and the trend of production of three different damage gases during two decades.
It is clear that the size of ozone hole in Antarctica was continuing increasing. Relating to the damage gases, except freon, NO2 and H2O2 had same trend as well as the ozone hole.
The size of Antarctica ozone hole expanded sharply from 80 thousands square kilometers to close to 100 thousands during 1985 to 1990 rather than other period. But in the last 5 years, it became steady.
According to the second graph, we can notice that there is no H2O2 in 1980, at the same time, NO2 and freon had 95 thousands metric tonnes and 150 thousands metric tonnes each. From 1985 to 1990, both NO2 and H2O2 were stable at 18 thousands metric toones and 105 thousands metric tonnes respectively. The freon peaked at 200 thousands metric tonnes in 1985, then it began to drop. A similar situation we can see in the NO2 and H2O2 in the last decade where the rate of increase reached at 4 times to 5 times. Comparing these 2 gases, the fastest rate of change is freon, from 1985 to 2000, it declined 9 times. In 2000, the freon only was 20 thousands metric tonnes, NO2 was 80 as the second, finally, NO2 was 160.
Overall, the connection between the size of Antrarctic and production of damaging gases is the more production of NO2 and H2O2, the less production of freon, the huger the hole is.
- The chart below shows three different types of crime in England and Wales from 1970 to 2005 67
- The graphs below show the size of ozone hole over Antarctica an the production of three ozone-damaging gases from 1980 to 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 148, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'trended'.
Suggestion: trended
...es, except freon, NO2 and H2O2 had same trend as well as the ozone hole. The size ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, second, then, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1185.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 259.0 196.424390244 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57528957529 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37644709233 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494208494208 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 343.8 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2906109824 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.75 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200792800096 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885383168309 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0885018329947 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164579428046 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.080921816993 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.