Some people prefer to work on school projects with a group, while others would rather work alone.
Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
It’s a personal preference for few to work on projects collectively in school whereas remaining prefer working individually. I personally believe having a personal space provides more accurate results than working together. I will discuss the pros and con's as we proceed. There are many benefits attached when you have ten minds working together on a single project. There will be number of innovative ideas and better corrections can be done if required. LIke minded people are extinct in modern world, which is an advantage in collective efforts working towards a singular goal. Working in groups also acts as a team building exercise that helps us to understand each other better. Responsibilities are shared equally in team activities. For instance, if there are 10 people working on a task one can do the research, second can work on the raw material required, others can support in various methods which is not feasible if you are a sole driver. Whilst working on your own, there are various factors that needs to be kept in mind in order to achieve completion. The biggest hurdle that an individual faces while working alone is lack of thoughts. You acts as a one man army where the leadership is completely yours. This piles up a lot of pressure if you are working independently. The margin of error is restricted and one is exposed to make errors. Whereas, a mass study can reduce that factor to nil. Both have up's and down however, working as a group has an upper hand when compared with working alone.
I favor the latter one since I strictly believe great heads have worked all alone and created history. Certainly people will like to work together as it has an added advantage of sharing knowledge.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-13 | Sandysingh | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-17 | amitkala17 | 61 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 278, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iscuss the pros and cons as we proceed. There are many benefits attached when yo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1036, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... not feasible if you are a sole driver. Whilst working on your own, there are va...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1370, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[4]
Message: The pronoun 'You' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'act'
Suggestion: act
... working alone is lack of thoughts. You acts as a one man army where the leadership ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 1570, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...cted and one is exposed to make errors. Whereas, a mass study can reduce that factor to...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1726, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... hand when compared with working alone. I favor the latter one since I strictly ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, so, whereas, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85714285714 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69426404154 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612244897959 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.7302479043 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.3333333333 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3333333333 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.27777777778 7.06120827912 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.38176352705 46% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31167477255 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864235289011 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773391303192 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214051599514 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0984122577298 0.056905535591 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.