Older vs. new friends
We need to communicate with people, specifically with our friends; therefore, it is important to make friends with whom we are comfortable the most to spend our time with. For various reasons, I believe that older friends are better companions. Ostensibly, some people may believe that we should find new friends, because we will obtain new experiences talking to them and improve our social appearance, however, I can declare the higher beneficiary of keeping our older friends, because we will make stronger relationships with them; also, we will share more memories with them. Finally, the most paramount reason is that older friends are typically more reliable compared to new ones.
First, we need strong relationships to enjoy our life. In fact, when you make new friend, your knowledge about him or her lacks in many aspects; things such as the behavior, family relationships, favorites, etc. would not be learned in short time. One should admit that all of these little information contributes to the strength of a relation. For instance, when I was in high school, one of my old friends was allergic to mango. Her new friend held a party for her birthday, serving a mango cake, not knowing about the possible allergic reaction. My friend ended-up at the hospital, and it was her worst birthday, ever. She was not angry at her new friend, given the explanation, but they never forget the incident. Therefore, if we want strong relations, we will need lots of information about our friends, and we cannot obtain them in a short time.
Second, with a longer time to spend with a person, you share more memories. You cannot start talking about your shared childhood memories upon seeing a new person. Most of the time we talk about our memories with our friends; without such kind of memories, it would be hard to find a topic to make more memories. For example, some years ago, my sister invited her friend home to spend a night with her. That night they slept sooner than us, as they had nothing to talk about. So, to improve the relationship with someone one need to share memories and therefore spend lots of time with that person.
Third, older friends tend to be more reliable. When we have problems, we prefer to consult with somebody who we know for a long time. This happens because we can rely on their honesty and help. For instance, when I have some academic problem and I need someone to consult with, the first person I am thinking of is my oldest friend. Therefore, we need reliable friends, and most of the times they are our oldest friends.
Consequently, I am of the conviction that the older friend is better. This is because we make strong bonds, have lots of shared memories and rely on them the most, but it would not harm to make new friends. So, I mainly suggest keeping our old friends, while making new friends from time to time. The effect of my solution would be that we have the benefits of our older companions while gaining new experience, but if not possible, for the aforementioned reasons, I conclude that longer relationships will be a better choice.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, third, while, for example, for instance, in fact, in short, kind of, such as, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 9.8082437276 224% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 84.0 43.0788530466 195% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2564.0 1977.66487455 130% => OK
No of words: 538.0 407.700716846 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76579925651 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81610080973 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57455610943 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.438661710037 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 769.5 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 23.0 9.59856630824 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.7928716487 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5714285714 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2142857143 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.17857142857 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 24.0 11.8709677419 202% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213381502164 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081530269839 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.08792088285 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147686852163 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717179985846 0.0645574589148 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.