All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Consultancy is one of the growing occupations here in the western world, where anyone with basic theoretical know-how or a Doctorate calls himself/herself a consultant. Companies hiring consultants and paying valuable money to these individuals who hardly know how the business runs daily is counterproductive. I'll agree with the prompt that it's best to listen to employees who understand the business than to hire consultants for the company to operate effectively.
To begin with, A company's employee who spends about 12 hours in the company's daily business activities would know best about the strength and weakness of a firm. Alehandro, who has been a staff at Kaplan for about 10 years knows every detail about the company, its allies, its strengths, its competitors and much more. He knows how best to advise the firm on different matters ranging from recruitment of new staffs who share the company's ideals and culture to how to handle new clients and customer retainment. It would even be more productive for Matt who is the CEO of Kaplan to Listen to what Alehandro and his other colleagues have to stay than to hire a consultant who would still need to listen to the likes of Alehandro to solidify his research and give feedback. Hiring consultant is not productive since one would pay valuable money for very little details compared to getting advice from employees.
Also, Listen to the employees gives a sense of ownership to the employees. It makes them feel part of the firm and this in turns increases productivity and also the efficiency of the company. Alehandro and his colleague won't feel left out in decision making and would understand that decisions made in the firm are for the growth of the firm and its employees. A research by Google suggests that Companies who operate an Autocratic kind of organization always tend to fail within two/three years of operation due to most of their good employees leaving the system.
Although, hiring Consultants would help one see things from another perspective and also bring new ideas at the cost of valuable money, but these ideas can be effectively gotten from listen deeply to employees and once refined help the company operate effectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | Arpit Sahni | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | shamitha | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | JENIRSHAH | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | caseya5 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Siddiqur Rahman | 50 | view |
- Claim The emergence of the online blogosphere and social media has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States Reason When anyone can publish political opinions easily standards for covering news and political topics wil 92
- The following appeared in a newsletter offering advice to investors:“Techcorporation is our top pick for investment this term. We urge all of our clients to invest in this new company. For the first time in ten years, a company that has developed satell 55
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 312, Rule ID: ILL_I_LL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'I'll'?
Suggestion: I'll
...siness runs daily is counterproductive. Ill agree with the prompt that its best to ...
^^^
Line 9, column 362, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: Research
...e growth of the firm and its employees. A research by Google suggests that Companies who o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1857.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 368.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04619565217 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81928398375 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535326086957 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.2932230427 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.846153846 118.986275619 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3076923077 23.4991977007 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.69230769231 5.21951772744 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28597891689 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103799381949 0.0831039109588 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614250308088 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174894004454 0.150359130593 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368502369738 0.0667264976115 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.