The pie chart below show the main reason why agriculture land become less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of world during the 1990.

Submitted by ThaoNHP on Sun, 11/17/2019 - 11:12

The pie chart indicates the major contribution divided into four factors namely over-grazing, over-cultivation, deforestation and other whilst the table depicts how much farmland became less productive in North America, Europe and Oceanic over the span of the 1990s.

Overall, over-grazing took the largest share concerning land degradation compared to other contributors. Meanwhile the total degraded land observed with the highest figure was witnessed in Europe.

Raising cattle by letting them graze on land caused the most negative influence with 35% in regard with the total. Over-cultivation took an account for 30 %, which ranked the second largest figure among the four factors and the global degradation caused by deforestation held 28%. The non-specific reason which was categorized as other only stood at 7 %.

The figures of deforestation and over-cultivation seen in Europe were by far the highest among three examined regions with 9.8% and 7.7% respectively. In addition, 23% of damaging factor belonged to Europe, the opposite was true for North America with merely 5%. Although Oceania was in no charge of over-cultivation, this region was responsible for the highest data in over-grazing with 11.3%.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by the user:
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...adation compared to other contributors. Meanwhile the total degraded land observed with t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tegorized as other only stood at 7 %. The figures of deforestation and over-cu...
^^^
Line 7, column 58, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...forestation and over-cultivation seen in Europe were by far the highest among th...
^^
Line 7, column 66, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion and over-cultivation seen in Europe were by far the highest among three exam...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1041.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62702702703 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23313226043 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654054054054 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.86906852 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.666666667 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0878866904917 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.037310228816 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0240097516791 0.0843802449381 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0568530248292 0.15604864568 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0206328757256 0.0819641961636 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 11.4140731707 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.