Some people think residents should keep their streets clean and tidy while others say it is the government’s responsibility.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some are of the view that the residents should maintain the tidiness and sanitation of the streets, whilst others say that it is the sole responsibility of government. This essay believes that although the residents pay the taxes for maintaining the orderliness and cleaning of the streets, the residents can identify the sources of contaminants and waste easily due to their long presence in the area compared to government-appointed housekeepers.
Residents are bound to pay various taxes, levied by the government on account of providing various services, which also includes the tax for maintaining the cleanliness and sanitation in the surrounding of residential areas. The money collected in the form of tax, from residents, is utilized for hiring third-party housekeeping services, which is given the responsibility to maintain the cleaning of residential areas. For example, a recent survey suggests, in developed countries, civilians pay about 3% of the total income in the form of tax for cleaning and sanitation.
Residents and occupants, who have a longer presence in the areas stand responsible to maintain the cleanliness in the surroundings. Because of their long presence, they can gauge for the sources of contamination and the wastages, be it people from next house or someone from another street and this can be informed to the concerned contractor or the housekeeper, responsible for maintaining the cleanliness. Therefore, necessary action can be taken for eliminating the source of waste and contamination. For example, according to The Earth, a television channel, in societies, where people own the responsibility to maintain the surroundings clean are found much cleaner, compare to those dependent on the government bodies for cleaning.
To conclude, in my opinion, though the civilians pay a hefty tax to the government for keeping the surroundings well cleaned, the locals must own the accountability for better control over the contaminants and waste.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, therefore, third, well, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1695.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52117263844 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34340346352 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504885993485 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.4139355906 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 169.5 106.682146367 159% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.7 20.7667163134 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148535837462 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681699178904 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681078829417 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102840086959 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706397709586 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 13.0946893788 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 50.2224549098 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.33 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 9.78957915832 199% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.7795591182 186% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.