The cheap airline encourages people to travel, however, it affects the environmental problems so the cost should be increased to discourage people to travel. Discuss both views and give your opinion?
In the technological era, living conditions of people are becoming better, this results in the fact that awareness of humankind towards environmental issues. Regarding this phenomenon, a large variety of people thinks that the rise in the price of fair air passenger carrier helps to decrease the traveling purposes of individuals. As far as I am concerned, I am partial to those who disagree with this problem.
On the one hand, the reasons for people who are opposed to the idea is that there are vivid advantages of low-budget flights being unable to deny. Initially, in terms of economic perspective, people and the government would reap certain benefits from this mean of transportation. Travelers are not only saved time but also provided the cost-effective service instead of they use other vehicles that are less convenient and unreasonable prices such as trains, buses or taxis. Not to mention that companies serving the air travel can contribute to society’s well-being through the tax system. The more tickets they sell, the more tax they have to pay to assist the Authority with such fields as education, health-care, infrastructure. What is more, the development of cheap commercial airline creates millions of jobs for employees who work in this service.
On the other hand, in spite of its obvious benefits, however, the drawback impacts of the airline with fare ticket should be not ignored. In more detail, the permission of those airlines would lead to the pollution of air which become has become one of the most concerned on a global scale. Specifically, these airlines that consume a vast amount of oil would make a contribution to the growth of the number of flights taking off, which stimulates the amount of exhaust fumes into the atmosphere. Nonetheless, the increase of air-fares to limit travel maybe not appropriate due to the fact that if this happens, passengers will use other vehicles consisting of train, buses and private cars, which means air pollution is not the matter of what kind of transportation travel, even these vehicles are the major contributing factor behind serious issues, especially congestion and damaged roads.
In conclusion, it strikes to me that lifting up the cost of air travel to restrict the disadvantage influences on surroundings is irrational and cheap airplanes should be acknowledged that brought great merit to humans, therefore, the states need to enact suitable policies in order to find the effective solution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-21 | Harrynguyen1980 | 78 | view |
- Space travel has been possible for some time and some people believe that space tourism should be developed in the future. What could be the reasons for this? Do you think it is a positive or o negative development? 89
- How do you think society will be affected by the growth of telecommunicating 67
- Most of the world’s urgent problems are caused by over-population. Do you agree or disagree? 89
- In many countries, the cost of living is rising. What are the effects on individuals and society? What measures could be taken to deal with this problem? 78
- Forests destruction will accelerate the extinction of animals and ultimately mankind For this reason logging in the world s rainforests should be phased out over the next decade To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, nonetheless, regarding, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, kind of, such as, in spite of, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2091.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 402.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20149253731 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97132092693 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 176.041082164 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587064676617 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 644.4 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.2488794505 49.4020404114 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.357142857 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7142857143 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7857142857 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206457901835 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637785051247 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0342963814271 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118045894218 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00997424258525 0.056905535591 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.