Do you agree or disagree: Modern technologies have affect the way peoplem communicate with each other.
At this stage the world has been facing kind of a technological “explosion” in all aspects of life. The technological advances, made during the last decades, have exceedingly improved peoples’ lives and released them from some troubles . However, they have also had adverse affects on many features of the society. Personally thinking , the main technological invention that has led to transformations in the life, especially the way people interact with each other, is the internet and I will explore the reasons in the following body paragraphs.
First of all, the addiction to the internet has considerably diminished the face to face communicative skills of people. Nowadays, people prefer to text each other rather than speak to them by telephone or in real life. It is mainly because of the fact that texting is much easier, when you want to ask somebody for some information or help, as you feel more free in your thoughts and do not have to look in the eyes of the person. Personally speaking, if I am asked to text a person or speak to him face to face, I will also choose texting, as speaking in the presence of a person is much difficult process.
Secondly, the internet has affected the way people interact with each other, because it has given people to find the answers of any questions they are worried about. This means that people do not need to turn to each other for some help or in order to get the answer of this or that question, inasmuch as they have another always-available option to choose; the internet. The internet knows the answer of virtually all questions like “ How do improve my skills”, “What to do to pass my exam?’’, ‘’Why I feel so depressed?’’ and even ‘’What if I am a shampoo?’’.
Thirdly, the internet has a lot of information about people in the world. In the past people should have some relationships in case they wanted to find a good doctor or a good teacher. But it is rather different for the time being, as the internet is full of the information about distinguished professionals their achievments and personal data. For example, if I need to find a good surgery in my country to ask him for some advice, I can just type in the internet ‘’ The best surgery in Armenia’’ and I will find a number of professional doctors with their phone numbers and e-mails. So in this way, the internet has definitely made up for the relationships.
To wrap up, the reasons mentioned above completely prove the fact that technologies and especially the internet has considerably damaged the way people used to interrupt with each other.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-22 | ChristineSmb | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree: a person should never make an important decision alone. 81
- Foreign visitors should pay more money than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. 73
- Why do you think some people are attracted to dangerous sports or other dangerous activities? 80
- ILLNESSES CAUSED BY STRESS HAVE BEEN INCREASED. WHY? 76
- Do you agree or disagree: the best way to solve the world’s environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 41, Rule ID: KIND_OF_A[1]
Message: Don't include 'a' after a classification term. Use simply 'kind of'.
Suggestion: kind of
...At this stage the world has been facing kind of a technological 'explosion' in ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...exceedingly improved peoples' lives and released them from some troubles . H...
^^
Line 1, column 252, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...es and released them from some troubles . However, they have also had adverse aff...
^^
Line 1, column 306, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ey have also had adverse affects on many features of the society. Personally thin...
^^
Line 1, column 352, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ures of the society. Personally thinking , the main technological invention that h...
^^
Line 1, column 451, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rmations in the life, especially the way people interact with each other, is the ...
^^
Line 5, column 234, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...telephone or in real life. It is mainly because of the fact that texting is much easier, when you want t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 456, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s of the person. Personally speaking, if I am asked to text a person or speak to...
^^
Line 5, column 462, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he person. Personally speaking, if I am asked to text a person or speak to him f...
^^
Line 5, column 528, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r speak to him face to face, I will also choose texting, as speaking in the prese...
^^
Line 13, column 560, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and I will find a number of professional doctors with their phone numbers and e-m...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, for example, i feel, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2248.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 450.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99555555556 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36908114607 2.67179642975 126% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497777777778 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 699.3 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.5404723216 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.235294118 100.406767564 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4705882353 20.6045352989 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88235294118 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 5.5376344086 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177679729451 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700080099718 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597385631935 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120948451922 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548226590071 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 11.7677419355 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.