Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
The person who has the power of the respective field plays a major contribution to the success of that field. The author claims that, in any field such as business, politics, education, government the power should step down after five years because this is the surest path to success. I disagree with both the claim and the reason because the young minds and the experienced ones both are equally responsible for the success of the enterprise.
Firstly, the experienced people of any field have a greater knowledge of their respective fields. For instance, the experienced leader has lots of knowledge of the situations that come during his leadership. For example, if some natural disaster occurs and people are in great difficulty, needs more money to survive or to bring that place in its original condition. In the situation like this, only the experienced leaders know better that how and from where to provide the funds to help people without disturbing the economy of the country. So, having experienced people in such a situation will be profitable rather than the new one, who cannot take the major decisions.
However, inexperienced people have fresh minds and fresh ideas. As a result, they can provide more advanced and innovative suggestions for the enterprise's development. For example, a programmer of the new technology. If such a person is a member of the enterprise, then he can make more profit than ever before by using the new and trending technologies in the business. Besides, the new minds are very enthusiastic to learn new things and can grasp more information than those of the old ones. Therefore, young peoples will only make a profit to the firm.
Even though the power of manager, leader, principal step down in five years, this is not only the way to success. Many other factors are responsible other that revitalization for the success of any field. For example, the reputation of the firm or of the leader during his previous work period, the relation of the firm in the market, etc. Hence, revitalization is not the only way to success.
In conclusion, I disagree with the claim and the reason because, according to me in some situations, the young, inexperienced people are suitable while in others the experienced ones are suitable. Therefore, equal opportunities should be given to young and experienced ones. One way to the success of any field is that the young and experienced people should work together, the people who help by giving innovative ideas and the ones who can assist by their experience.
- "Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin, a medicine used to treat headaches. Although many foods are naturally rich in salicylates, for the past several decades, food-processing companies have also been adding salicylates to f 66
- Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when my grandparents were children 70
- Sea otters. 73
- Although innovations such as video, computers, and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students, these technologies all too often distract from real learning.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agr 70
- The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and s 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 144, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'enterprises'' or 'enterprise's'?
Suggestion: enterprises'; enterprise's
...nced and innovative suggestions for the enterprises development. For example, a programmer ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2136.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 427.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00234192037 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80755134467 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461358313817 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 666.0 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5804834107 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.714285714 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.95238095238 5.21951772744 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321937941004 0.243740707755 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917332794583 0.0831039109588 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112073591967 0.0758088955206 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184274283544 0.150359130593 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13679108562 0.0667264976115 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.