the charts below show the information about land use in four countries
The pie charts illustrate the statistic about land use by purpose in four countries namely Portugal, New Zealand, Canada and Norway.
Overall, it is clear that most land of these countries is non-agriculture. Also, except to New Zealand, the arable land of others is large than the pasture land.
Looking at the pie charts more closely, one can see that the land us by non-agriculture accounts for over 90% in Canada and Norway. At just under 60%, Portugal’s share non-agricultural land is also quite high. In contrast, New Zealand’s land use by this purpose is nearly equal to the pasture purpose, is at 51%. Meanwhile, the land use by arable purpose is just under 10% in each three countries namely Portugal, Canada and Norway, with the rate of Canada is just 2% and Norway is 1%. While Portugal use 34% of total land for arable purpose, the other countries are just equal to or less than five percent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-17 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-29 | trpg143 | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-22 | trpg143 | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | trpg143 | 67 | view |
- Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is waste of money. government must invest ths money in public service instead. to what extent do you agree with this statement? 61
- Although more and more people read the news on the internet, newspaper, will remain the main source of news for the majority of people. Do you agree or disagree with the statement 56
- some people believe that the development of artificial intelligence will make human labour obsolete 87
- The table below gives information about government expenditure in five sectors relating to domestic policy in Germany Italy and the United Kingdom in 2009 49
- The pie chart show the reasons people in Great Britain had for visiting art museums in the years 1990 and 2000 86
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, look, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 764.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83544303797 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82982179007 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550632911392 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.5713816338 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269761567921 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133370326625 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0834502013444 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22618364969 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.082435863579 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.