The first chart shows the population of England and Wales between 1700 and 2000. The second chart gives information about the birth and death rates in the same countries and same periods.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and,make comparisons where relevant.
The two bar graphs illustrate the information about the proportion of populace, birth and death numbers which were in four hundred years periods in two various regions such as England and Wales during 1700 and 2000. Moreover, units were measured in millions and per 1000.
In overall,18th and 20th centuries constituted a major for population, birth and death rates since least amount was found in 17th century. However, there were lots of transformation can be noticed in the amount of all given things over the periods.
With regards to an initial graph, the England and Wales was most popular for populace during 2000 which accounted at nearly a half millions followed by 19th (two fifth millions) and 18th (approximately a quarter millions) centuries. Likewise, only 9% millions overflow of masses observed between 1700 in both nations.
The second chart proves that during 1800, the birth and death rates reached to peak level from around a quarter per 1000 to 15 per 1000 in the England and Wales. In contrast, the amount of death and birth was found 13 per 1000,9 per 1000 and 7 per 1000 respectively in two given countries in 1900 and 1700. Lastly, the England and Wales accounted for 5 per 1000 for death rate and experienced a little more than a two fold to one in ten per 1000 for birth rates during 2000.
- Nowadays most people are not as fit and active as they were in the past? What are the main causes of this situation? Suggest some possible solutions? 78
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- All the cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- Demand for food is increasing worldwide? What is the cause of this? What measures can the international community take to make sure the supply of food is enough? 78
- The graph below shows the average of carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden,Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, lastly, likewise, moreover, second, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1103.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83771929825 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49670450692 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552631578947 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4313913374 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.555555556 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187230572208 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0773697415518 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532486038924 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105177975886 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402053501488 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.