Public transportation versus roads and highways.
When trying to allocate government funds for transportation infrastructure, there is always the argument for spending money on roads versus public transport. Some people argue that making better roads that cover more cities is the way to do it. However, I disagree and strongly believe that most of the resources should be spent on public transport.
First off, most commutes are done inside cities and having higher quality roads and highways will not improve the people's experience who shuttle every day from home to work and vice versa. By pouring more resources into purchasing more comfortable trains and more extensive subways, everyday lives of citizens will be enhanced much more deeply than it would with better roads. The money spent on roads, which will be sitting idle and unused most of the time, will be somewhat wasted and it can be put to much better use in the public transportation system.
The second reason why I hold this opinion is that having an advanced public transportation system will encourage more people to use it. The overall condition of the public transportation system is usually abysmal in most cities and this hinders its adaptation as the main means of transportation for many people. Having a more accessible and comfortable public transportation system will add to its appeal and attract more users which will lead to savings for the people who use it. Also, fewer private vehicles will result in improvements to the environment due to the decrease in pollution.
Last but not least, most people traveling between cities, often take airplanes which are mainly owned by the private section. Air travel has become so affordable during the past few decades that it has made itself the main means of inter-city travel. Most people prefer flights to road trips. This means that the roads and highways constructed by the government will not affect the majority of inter-city travels.
All in all, I think nowadays the public transportation system is far more important than the roads network in a country. Therefore, the government must pay more attention to the trains and subways than it does to roads. This attention includes the time spent on planning new strategies and also the amount of funds and resources spent on improving the general condition of the transportation system and the amenities provided to those who use it throughout the country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-21 | Take | 70 | view |
| 2023-05-02 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-05-02 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | younessam | 70 | view |
| 2023-03-26 | prakriti malla | 80 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Offering employees options 75
- Teachers are not valuable as they were in the past, do you agree or disagree. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 351, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es should be spent on public transport. First off, most commutes are done inside...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 502, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...ll be somewhat wasted and it can be put to much better use in the public transport...
^^
Line 9, column 137, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...m will encourage more people to use it. The overall condition of the public transpo...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, second, so, therefore, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2014.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 394.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1116751269 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72559999988 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51269035533 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.511644903 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.470588235 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1764705882 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.35294117647 5.45110844103 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244824512589 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906680652141 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0906580756819 0.0737576698707 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156721333613 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105815042573 0.0645574589148 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.