tpo 31 the lines in the Sinosauropteryx represent feathers
The material discusses the lined that were found on the Sinosauropteryx are represent feathers or not. While the reading looks at the topic from one perspective, the listening challenges certain points outlined in the reading passage.
First, the author states that these lines were formed by skin decomposition after the animal's death. On the other hand, the professor opposes this and mentions that there are no decomposition marks on other animals that were buried in the same area. Furthermore, the lecturer adds that the function of the skin was beautifully preserved because the animals were buried in volcanic ash. The speaker cits that the lines of the feathers were well preserved too, so it is more possible that these lines represent feathers, not fibers that formed from skin decomposition.
Second, the writer posits that these lines that surrounding the skeleton could be frills rather than feathers. On the contrary, the professor refutes this and contends that there is a chemical difference between frills and feathers. The lecturer explains that feathers have beta-keratin; however, frills do not have that chemical composition. Moreover, the speaker adds that when paleontologists examined the structure found that it contains beta-keratin, so the fine lines are more likely to represent feathers rather than frills.
Third, the reading points out that the lines located along the backbone and the tail of the animal, so the animal could not use them for flying or regulate temperature, so feathers were useless. Conversely, the professor contradicts this and states that animals could use feathers for other purposes. The lecturer explains that peacock has feathers on its tails to attract mates, which called display function. The speaker says that, by analysis, they found that the structures were colorful, orange and white. The professor states that this evidence supports that the animal used its feathers for display function.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Universities should give the same amount of money to their students sports activities as they give to their univesity libraries. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 64
- Some people argue that current Social media like T.V news, newspaper and radio provide wrong information. Some people say that the current social media are misleading the people and create problems within the society. Do you agree or disagree? 71
- Describe one of the most important days in your life and why it was so important to you. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-29 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 72
- tpo 45 fossilized structures could resemble a bee nests 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
... formed by skin decomposition after the animals death. On the other hand, the professor...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 512, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ctures were colorful, orange and white. The professor states that this evidence sup...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, second, so, third, well, while, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 24.0 12.0772626932 199% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1653.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 306.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40196078431 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71375665855 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496732026144 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 496.8 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 15.0 8.23620309051 182% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2531652193 49.2860985944 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.2 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 7.06452816374 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391337390694 0.272083759551 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131852219993 0.0996497079465 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734078821308 0.0662205650399 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221060121241 0.162205337803 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607852156223 0.0443174109184 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.